Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-20 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 20/11/15 15:34, Wei Liu wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 04:29:04PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 20/11/15 16:14, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 19.11.15 at 12:47, wrote: On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 18/11/

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-20 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 20/11/15 15:41, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 20/11/15 15:34, Wei Liu wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 04:29:04PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> On 20/11/15 16:14, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 19.11.15 at 12:47, wrote: > On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-20 Thread Wei Liu
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 04:29:04PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 20/11/15 16:14, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 19.11.15 at 12:47, wrote: > >> On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote: > > Hi J

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-20 Thread Juergen Gross
On 20/11/15 16:14, Jan Beulich wrote: On 19.11.15 at 12:47, wrote: >> On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote: > Hi Juergen > > Looks like there is something we missed after all. >

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-20 Thread Wei Liu
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 08:14:00AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 19.11.15 at 12:47, wrote: > > On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote: > >> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > >>> On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote: > Hi Juergen > > Looks like there is someth

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-20 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 19.11.15 at 12:47, wrote: > On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote: Hi Juergen Looks like there is something we missed after all. On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-19 Thread Wei Liu
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 01:29:01PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: [...] > > To be precise, the problem is in mini-os, which is used by rump kernel > > as well. :-( > > > >> pvgrub is making assumptions about the page table allocation scheme > >> of the toolset starting pvgrub. It is calculating the f

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-19 Thread Juergen Gross
On 19/11/15 13:19, Wei Liu wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:47:41PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote: > Hi Juergen > > Looks like there is something

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-19 Thread Wei Liu
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:47:41PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > >> On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote: > >>> Hi Juergen > >>> > >>> Looks like there is something we missed after all. > >>> > >>> On W

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-19 Thread Juergen Gross
On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote: >>> Hi Juergen >>> >>> Looks like there is something we missed after all. >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osstest service owner wrote: flight

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-19 Thread Juergen Gross
On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote: >>> Hi Juergen >>> >>> Looks like there is something we missed after all. >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osstest service owner wrote: flight

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-19 Thread Wei Liu
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:55:13AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 10:50 +, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:30:30AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > > > > On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > > Hi Ju

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-19 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 10:50 +, Wei Liu wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:30:30AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > > > On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > Hi Juergen > > > > > > > > Looks like there is something we missed after all

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-19 Thread Wei Liu
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:30:30AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > > On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote: > > > Hi Juergen > > > > > > Looks like there is something we missed after all. > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osste

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-19 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote: > > Hi Juergen > > > > Looks like there is something we missed after all. > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osstest service owner wrote: > > > flight 64494 xen-unstable real [real] > > > ht

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-19 Thread Juergen Gross
On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote: > Hi Juergen > > Looks like there is something we missed after all. > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osstest service owner wrote: >> flight 64494 xen-unstable real [real] >> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64494/ >> >> Regressions :-

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-18 Thread Juergen Gross
On 18/11/15 16:59, Wei Liu wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:54:34PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote: >>> Hi Juergen >>> >>> Looks like there is something we missed after all. >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osstest service owner wrote: fligh

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-18 Thread Wei Liu
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:54:34PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote: > > Hi Juergen > > > > Looks like there is something we missed after all. > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osstest service owner wrote: > >> flight 64494 xen-unstable real [real] >

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-18 Thread Juergen Gross
On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote: > Hi Juergen > > Looks like there is something we missed after all. > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osstest service owner wrote: >> flight 64494 xen-unstable real [real] >> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64494/ >> >> Regressions :-

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-18 Thread Wei Liu
Hi Juergen Looks like there is something we missed after all. On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osstest service owner wrote: > flight 64494 xen-unstable real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64494/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are bloc

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 64494: regressions - FAIL

2015-11-18 Thread osstest service owner
flight 64494 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64494/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 10 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 64035 test-armhf-armhf-xl