On 20/11/15 15:34, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 04:29:04PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 20/11/15 16:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.11.15 at 12:47, wrote:
On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 18/11/
On 20/11/15 15:41, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 20/11/15 15:34, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 04:29:04PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 20/11/15 16:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 19.11.15 at 12:47, wrote:
> On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 04:29:04PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 20/11/15 16:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.11.15 at 12:47, wrote:
> >> On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Hi J
On 20/11/15 16:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.11.15 at 12:47, wrote:
>> On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote:
> Hi Juergen
>
> Looks like there is something we missed after all.
>
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 08:14:00AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 19.11.15 at 12:47, wrote:
> > On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >>> On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote:
> Hi Juergen
>
> Looks like there is someth
>>> On 19.11.15 at 12:47, wrote:
> On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote:
Hi Juergen
Looks like there is something we missed after all.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 01:29:01PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
[...]
> > To be precise, the problem is in mini-os, which is used by rump kernel
> > as well. :-(
> >
> >> pvgrub is making assumptions about the page table allocation scheme
> >> of the toolset starting pvgrub. It is calculating the f
On 19/11/15 13:19, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:47:41PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote:
> Hi Juergen
>
> Looks like there is something
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:47:41PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote:
> >>> Hi Juergen
> >>>
> >>> Looks like there is something we missed after all.
> >>>
> >>> On W
On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> Hi Juergen
>>>
>>> Looks like there is something we missed after all.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osstest service owner wrote:
flight
On 19/11/15 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> Hi Juergen
>>>
>>> Looks like there is something we missed after all.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osstest service owner wrote:
flight
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:55:13AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 10:50 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:30:30AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > > On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > > Hi Ju
On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 10:50 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:30:30AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > Hi Juergen
> > > >
> > > > Looks like there is something we missed after all
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:30:30AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > Hi Juergen
> > >
> > > Looks like there is something we missed after all.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osste
On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:24 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Hi Juergen
> >
> > Looks like there is something we missed after all.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osstest service owner wrote:
> > > flight 64494 xen-unstable real [real]
> > > ht
On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote:
> Hi Juergen
>
> Looks like there is something we missed after all.
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osstest service owner wrote:
>> flight 64494 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64494/
>>
>> Regressions :-
On 18/11/15 16:59, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:54:34PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> Hi Juergen
>>>
>>> Looks like there is something we missed after all.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osstest service owner wrote:
fligh
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:54:34PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Hi Juergen
> >
> > Looks like there is something we missed after all.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osstest service owner wrote:
> >> flight 64494 xen-unstable real [real]
>
On 18/11/15 15:49, Wei Liu wrote:
> Hi Juergen
>
> Looks like there is something we missed after all.
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osstest service owner wrote:
>> flight 64494 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64494/
>>
>> Regressions :-
Hi Juergen
Looks like there is something we missed after all.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:57PM +, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 64494 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64494/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are bloc
flight 64494 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64494/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 10 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 64035
test-armhf-armhf-xl
21 matches
Mail list logo