On 17.03.15 at 01:46, andreww...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/16/15, Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com wrote:
So where do you expect the major performance / scalability
improvement to be gained? Internally to Xen, each page will need
to be tracked separately anyway, as what appears physically
On 3/17/15, Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com wrote:
And how would that be significantly different from the batching
that's already built into the grant table hypercall?
I guess it does do more or less what I want already. I was looking
more at the inner mapping/unmapping functions, rather than the
On 3/16/15, Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com wrote:
So where do you expect the major performance / scalability
improvement to be gained? Internally to Xen, each page will need
to be tracked separately anyway, as what appears physically
contiguous in the granting guest may (and likely will) not be
Has anyone done any work on sharing of large multiple-page segments
between domains? The current grant table implementation is unsuitable
for this because it only allows sharing single pages and is limited to a
relatively small number of entries (and passing large numbers of
single-page grant
