On 01/03/2017 12:32 PM, anshul makkar wrote:
>
>
> On 08/12/16 23:40, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/08/2016 05:21 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 08/12/2016 19:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>
>>>
Of course even the largest virtual machine today (2TB on Amazon AFAIK)
is not close
On 08/12/16 23:40, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 12/08/2016 05:21 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 08/12/2016 19:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Of course even the largest virtual machine today (2TB on Amazon AFAIK)
is not close to reaching the current memory limit, but it's just a
matter of time.
>>> On 09.12.16 at 11:07, wrote:
> On 09/12/16 10:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Right; a first question though would be whether 5-level support
>> would be a build time selection (just like 32-bit PAE was long ago),
>> or runtime determined.
>
> Guessing you mean Linux kernel here: the intention is t
On 09/12/16 10:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 08.12.16 at 18:22, wrote:
>> On 08/12/16 16:46, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> The first round of (very preliminary) patches for supporting the new
>>> 5-level paging of future Intel x86 processors [1] has been posted to
>>> lkml:
>>>
>>> https://lkml.org/lk
>>> On 08.12.16 at 18:22, wrote:
> On 08/12/16 16:46, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> The first round of (very preliminary) patches for supporting the new
>> 5-level paging of future Intel x86 processors [1] has been posted to
>> lkml:
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/12/8/378
>>
>> An explicit note has
>>> On 09.12.16 at 00:40, wrote:
> I've been working (on and off) with SGI to get one of their 32TB boxes
> to boot and I don't think that works. We've fixed a couple of bugs but I
> don't think Xen can boot with that much memory. We successfully booted
> with just under 8TB but couldn't do it
On 12/08/2016 07:20 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 08/12/2016 23:40, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Of course even the largest virtual machine today (2TB on Amazon AFAIK)
is not close to reaching the current memory limit, but it's just a
matter of time.
/me things Oracle will have something to say
On 08/12/2016 23:40, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> Of course even the largest virtual machine today (2TB on Amazon AFAIK)
>>> is not close to reaching the current memory limit, but it's just a
>>> matter of time.
>>
>> /me things Oracle will have something to say about this. I'm sure there
>>
On 12/08/2016 05:21 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 08/12/2016 19:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Of course even the largest virtual machine today (2TB on Amazon AFAIK)
is not close to reaching the current memory limit, but it's just a
matter of time.
/me things Oracle will have something to s
On 08/12/2016 19:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 08/12/16 16:46, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> The first round of (very preliminary) patches for supporting the new
>>> 5-level paging of future Intel x86 processors [1] has been posted to
>>> lkml:
>>>
>>> ht
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 08/12/16 16:46, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > The first round of (very preliminary) patches for supporting the new
> > 5-level paging of future Intel x86 processors [1] has been posted to
> > lkml:
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/12/8/378
> >
> > An expli
On 08/12/16 16:46, Juergen Gross wrote:
> The first round of (very preliminary) patches for supporting the new
> 5-level paging of future Intel x86 processors [1] has been posted to
> lkml:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/12/8/378
>
> An explicit note has been added: "CONFIG_XEN is broken." and
> "I
The first round of (very preliminary) patches for supporting the new
5-level paging of future Intel x86 processors [1] has been posted to
lkml:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/12/8/378
An explicit note has been added: "CONFIG_XEN is broken." and
"I would appreciate help with the code."
I think we sho
13 matches
Mail list logo
