On 12/23/2016 05:51 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been looking into the STAO specification[0], because I think it would
> also
> be useful for x86 PVHv2 Dom0, but I'm not really sure how is Xen supposed to
> use it.
>
> Xen doesn't have an AML parser, so I'm not sure how is it
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been looking into the STAO specification[0], because I think it would
> also
> be useful for x86 PVHv2 Dom0, but I'm not really sure how is Xen supposed to
> use it.
>
> Xen doesn't have an AML parser, so I'm not sure how is it
On 3 January 2017 at 17:50, Al Stone wrote:
> On 12/23/2016 05:51 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been looking into the STAO specification[0], because I think it would
>> also
>> be useful for x86 PVHv2 Dom0, but I'm not really sure how is Xen supposed to
>>
Hello,
I've been looking into the STAO specification[0], because I think it would also
be useful for x86 PVHv2 Dom0, but I'm not really sure how is Xen supposed to
use it.
Xen doesn't have an AML parser, so I'm not sure how is it supposed to guess
the name of the devices it wants to hide from