uot;Stefano Stabellini"; "Ian
> Campbell"; ;
> Sent: 2015-04-21 (화) 19:13:54
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Is it ok to routing periperal irq to any Domain0's
> vCPU on Xen ARM 4.5.x?
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, 신정섭 wrote:
> > I have a one more question.
"<stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com>
> To: "신정섭"<supsup5...@naver.com>;
> Cc: "Stefano Stabellini"<stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com>; "Ian
Campbell"<ian.campb...@citrix.com>; <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>;
> Sent: 2015-04-21 (화) 02:2
#x27;t use maintanance interrupt?
No, that is just a performance optimization.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Stefano Stabellini"
> To: "신정섭";
> Cc: "Stefano Stabellini"; "Ian
> Campbell"; ;
> Sent: 2015-04-2
p5...@naver.com>;
Cc: "Stefano Stabellini"<stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com>; "Ian
Campbell"<ian.campb...@citrix.com>; <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>;
Sent: 2015-04-21 (화) 02:25:09
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Is it ok to routing periperal irq to any Domain0's
vCPU
ork and it should have a concrete effect in the
delivery of the physical interrupt.
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Stefano Stabellini"
> To: "신정섭";
> Cc: "Ian Campbell"; ;
> "Stefano Stabellini";
> Sent: 2015-04-20 (월) 19:4
bell"<ian.campb...@citrix.com>;
<xen-devel@lists.xen.org>; "Stefano
Stabellini"<stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com>;
Sent: 2015-04-20 (월) 19:49:50
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Is it ok to routing periperal irq to any Domain0's
vCPU on Xen ARM 4.5.x?
In Xen 4.5
>
>
> On Xen 4.4.1 my simple Simple peripheral irq routing Code is working well.
> (below)
>
> But Xen 4.5.0 it dosen't.
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: "Ian Campbell"
> To: "신정섭";
> Cc: ; "Stefano
>
pbell"<ian.campb...@citrix.com>
To: "신정섭"<supsup5...@naver.com>;
Cc: <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>; "Stefano
Stabellini"<stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com>;
Sent: 2015-04-17 (금) 18:49:39
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Is it ok to routing periperal irq to
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 11:36 +0900, 신정섭 wrote:
>
>
> I'm studying periperal irq routing to Domain0's vCPU
What do you mean by "peripheral irq routing"? Do you mean supporting the
guest writing to GICD_ITARGER to cause an interrupt to be injected to a
specific vcpu?
I thought that was supposed t
I'm studying periperal irq routing to Domain0's vCPU
I'm testing on Arndale Broad and Domain 0 has 2 vCPU.
So Xen can select vcpu0 or vcpu1 to inject periperal irq.
I tested periperal routing on Xen 4.4.1 and it works well.
But I tested periperal routing on Xen 4.5.0 but irq dosen't works wel
10 matches
Mail list logo
