Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 4.2-rc6 regression: RIP: e030:[ffffffff8110fb18] [ffffffff8110fb18] detach_if_pending+0x18/0x80

2015-08-17 Thread Sander Eikelenboom
Saturday, August 15, 2015, 12:39:25 AM, you wrote: On Sat, 2015-08-15 at 00:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: On 2015-08-13 00:41, Eric Dumazet wrote: On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 23:46 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: Thanks for the reminder, but luckily i was aware of that, seen enough

Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 4.2-rc6 regression: RIP: e030:[ffffffff8110fb18] [ffffffff8110fb18] detach_if_pending+0x18/0x80

2015-08-17 Thread Jon Christopherson
This is very similar to the behavior I am seeing in this bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102911 -Jon ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 4.2-rc6 regression: RIP: e030:[ffffffff8110fb18] [ffffffff8110fb18] detach_if_pending+0x18/0x80

2015-08-17 Thread Sander Eikelenboom
Monday, August 17, 2015, 3:37:13 PM, you wrote: On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 11:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: Saturday, August 15, 2015, 12:39:25 AM, you wrote: On Sat, 2015-08-15 at 00:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: On 2015-08-13 00:41, Eric Dumazet wrote: On Wed, 2015-08-12 at

Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 4.2-rc6 regression: RIP: e030:[ffffffff8110fb18] [ffffffff8110fb18] detach_if_pending+0x18/0x80

2015-08-17 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 11:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: Saturday, August 15, 2015, 12:39:25 AM, you wrote: On Sat, 2015-08-15 at 00:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: On 2015-08-13 00:41, Eric Dumazet wrote: On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 23:46 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: Thanks

Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 4.2-rc6 regression: RIP: e030:[ffffffff8110fb18] [ffffffff8110fb18] detach_if_pending+0x18/0x80

2015-08-17 Thread Sander Eikelenboom
Monday, August 17, 2015, 4:21:47 PM, you wrote: On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:02 -0500, Jon Christopherson wrote: This is very similar to the behavior I am seeing in this bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102911 OK, but have you applied the fix ?

Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 4.2-rc6 regression: RIP: e030:[ffffffff8110fb18] [ffffffff8110fb18] detach_if_pending+0x18/0x80

2015-08-17 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:02 -0500, Jon Christopherson wrote: This is very similar to the behavior I am seeing in this bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102911 OK, but have you applied the fix ?

Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 4.2-rc6 regression: RIP: e030:[ffffffff8110fb18] [ffffffff8110fb18] detach_if_pending+0x18/0x80

2015-08-17 Thread Jon Christopherson
On 08/17/2015 12:18 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com snip Then can you try following fix as well ? Thanks ! [PATCH] timer: fix a race in __mod_timer() snip I have been running the latest code from git with the 2 patches in this thread applied. No issues

Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 4.2-rc6 regression: RIP: e030:[ffffffff8110fb18] [ffffffff8110fb18] detach_if_pending+0x18/0x80

2015-08-17 Thread Jon Christopherson
On 08/17/2015 09:25 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: OK, but have you applied the fix ? http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/?id=83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af It will be part of net iteration from David Miller to Linus Torvald. I did not have that

Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 4.2-rc6 regression: RIP: e030:[ffffffff8110fb18] [ffffffff8110fb18] detach_if_pending+0x18/0x80

2015-08-17 Thread Eric Dumazet
From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 16:25 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: Monday, August 17, 2015, 4:21:47 PM, you wrote: On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:02 -0500, Jon Christopherson wrote: This is very similar to the behavior I am seeing in this bug:

Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 4.2-rc6 regression: RIP: e030:[ffffffff8110fb18] [ffffffff8110fb18] detach_if_pending+0x18/0x80

2015-08-17 Thread Sander Eikelenboom
On 2015-08-17 19:18, Eric Dumazet wrote: From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 16:25 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: Monday, August 17, 2015, 4:21:47 PM, you wrote: On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:02 -0500, Jon Christopherson wrote: This is very similar to the behavior I am

Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 4.2-rc6 regression: RIP: e030:[ffffffff8110fb18] [ffffffff8110fb18] detach_if_pending+0x18/0x80

2015-08-17 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Eric Dumazet wrote: [PATCH] timer: fix a race in __mod_timer() lock_timer_base() can not catch following : CPU1 ( in __mod_timer() timer-flags |= TIMER_MIGRATING; spin_unlock(base-lock); base = new_base; spin_lock(base-lock); timer-flags = ~TIMER_BASEMASK;

Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 4.2-rc6 regression: RIP: e030:[ffffffff8110fb18] [ffffffff8110fb18] detach_if_pending+0x18/0x80

2015-08-14 Thread Sander Eikelenboom
On 2015-08-13 00:41, Eric Dumazet wrote: On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 23:46 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: Thanks for the reminder, but luckily i was aware of that, seen enough of your replies asking for patches to be resubmitted against the other tree ;) Kernel with patch is currently running so

Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 4.2-rc6 regression: RIP: e030:[ffffffff8110fb18] [ffffffff8110fb18] detach_if_pending+0x18/0x80

2015-08-14 Thread Sander Eikelenboom
On 2015-08-15 00:09, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: On 2015-08-13 00:41, Eric Dumazet wrote: On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 23:46 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: Thanks for the reminder, but luckily i was aware of that, seen enough of your replies asking for patches to be resubmitted against the other

Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 4.2-rc6 regression: RIP: e030:[ffffffff8110fb18] [ffffffff8110fb18] detach_if_pending+0x18/0x80

2015-08-14 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Sat, 2015-08-15 at 00:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: On 2015-08-13 00:41, Eric Dumazet wrote: On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 23:46 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: Thanks for the reminder, but luckily i was aware of that, seen enough of your replies asking for patches to be resubmitted