scan-ad...@coverity.com writes ("New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for
XenProject"):
> Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to XenProject found
> with Coverity Scan.
>
> 35 new defect(s) introduced to XenProject found with Coverity Scan.
> 2 defect(s), reported by
On 25/02/16 10:00, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 21:02 -0800, scan-ad...@coverity.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to XenProject
>> found with Coverity Scan.
>>
>> 2 new defect(s) introduced to XenProject found with Coverity Scan.
On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 21:02 -0800, scan-ad...@coverity.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to XenProject found
> with Coverity Scan.
>
> 2 new defect(s) introduced to XenProject found with Coverity Scan.
> 12 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan
On 4/2/2015 at 08:32 AM, Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Charles,
I'm not sure if this is a real issue in the qdisk support for xenstat,
but I think it may relate to the first return 0 in qmp_read which may
not free the accumulated array.
Yes. That is a leak on the failure
Hi Charles,
I'm not sure if this is a real issue in the qdisk support for xenstat,
but I think it may relate to the first return 0 in qmp_read which may
not free the accumulated array.
Could you take a look please?
Ian.
On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 05:51 -0700, scan-ad...@coverity.com wrote:
Hi,
