Re: [Xen-devel] Ping: [PATCH] use clear_domain_page() instead of open coding it

2015-11-02 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 07:06 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 19.10.15 at 16:51, wrote: > > "REST" maintainers, could I please get an ack or otherwise on this > common code change? > > Thanks, Jan > > > --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c > > +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c > >

[Xen-devel] Ping: [PATCH] use clear_domain_page() instead of open coding it

2015-10-26 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 19.10.15 at 16:51, wrote: "REST" maintainers, could I please get an ack or otherwise on this common code change? Thanks, Jan > --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c > +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c > @@ -1959,22 +1959,16 @@ __initcall(pagealloc_keyhandler_init); > > void

Re: [Xen-devel] Ping: [PATCH] use clear_domain_page() instead of open coding it

2015-10-26 Thread Ian Jackson
Jan Beulich writes ("Ping: [PATCH] use clear_domain_page() instead of open coding it"): > "REST" maintainers, could I please get an ack or otherwise on this > common code change? I'm not qualified to review this, but I would have thought an ack from George should be sufficient ? (Also is your

Re: [Xen-devel] Ping: [PATCH] use clear_domain_page() instead of open coding it

2015-10-26 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 26.10.15 at 16:47, wrote: > Jan Beulich writes ("Ping: [PATCH] use clear_domain_page() instead of open > coding it"): >> "REST" maintainers, could I please get an ack or otherwise on this >> common code change? > > I'm not qualified to review this, but I would