>>> On 15.12.16 at 13:03, wrote:
> On 15/12/16 09:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.12.16 at 16:27, wrote:
>> On 09.12.16 at 16:19, wrote:
>>> On 09.12.16 at 15:56, wrote:
> It is a layering violation to remove the host_has_* part of the check
> from the emulator.
This is
On 15/12/16 09:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.12.16 at 16:27, wrote:
> On 09.12.16 at 16:19, wrote:
>> On 09.12.16 at 15:56, wrote:
It is a layering violation to remove the host_has_* part of the check
from the emulator.
>>> This is from a very, very abstract perspective. Th
>>> On 09.12.16 at 16:27, wrote:
On 09.12.16 at 16:19, wrote:
> On 09.12.16 at 15:56, wrote:
>>> It is a layering violation to remove the host_has_* part of the check
>>> from the emulator.
>>
>> This is from a very, very abstract perspective. The fact that
>> host_and_vcpu_*() and vcp