Re: [Xen-devel] Ping: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: drop cpu_has_sse{,2}

2016-12-15 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 15.12.16 at 13:03, wrote: > On 15/12/16 09:57, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 09.12.16 at 16:27, wrote: >> On 09.12.16 at 16:19, wrote: >>> On 09.12.16 at 15:56, wrote: > It is a layering violation to remove the host_has_* part of the check > from the emulator. This is

Re: [Xen-devel] Ping: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: drop cpu_has_sse{,2}

2016-12-15 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 15/12/16 09:57, Jan Beulich wrote: On 09.12.16 at 16:27, wrote: > On 09.12.16 at 16:19, wrote: >> On 09.12.16 at 15:56, wrote: It is a layering violation to remove the host_has_* part of the check from the emulator. >>> This is from a very, very abstract perspective. Th

[Xen-devel] Ping: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: drop cpu_has_sse{,2}

2016-12-15 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 09.12.16 at 16:27, wrote: On 09.12.16 at 16:19, wrote: > On 09.12.16 at 15:56, wrote: >>> It is a layering violation to remove the host_has_* part of the check >>> from the emulator. >> >> This is from a very, very abstract perspective. The fact that >> host_and_vcpu_*() and vcp