Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-02-15 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Olaf Hering wrote: > Am Tue, 14 Feb 2017 20:27:15 + > schrieb Wei Liu : > > > Better to just push to a branch for us to fetch. > > That would be git://github.com/olafhering/xen.git#libreoffice > >

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-02-15 Thread Olaf Hering
Am Tue, 14 Feb 2017 20:27:15 + schrieb Wei Liu : > Better to just push to a branch for us to fetch. That would be git://github.com/olafhering/xen.git#libreoffice https://github.com/olafhering/xen/commits/libreoffice Thanks, Olaf pgpgIrWZLs_Dh.pgp Description:

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-02-14 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 09:02:14PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > Interestingly, my "git am" is unable to apply those patches. Does it > > work for you? I cannot see anything wrong with them, but they don't > > work. If the problem is that they are too

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-02-14 Thread Olaf Hering
On Tue, Feb 14, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Interestingly, my "git am" is unable to apply those patches. Does it > work for you? I cannot see anything wrong with them, but they don't > work. If the problem is that they are too large, please send the files > as attachments. Its the '\ No newline

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-02-14 Thread Olaf Hering
On Tue, Feb 14, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Also, I tried to do the same conversion with my copy of Libreoffice and > the FODT files produced are significantly different from yours, which > means, even if we use FODT docs, we are probably going to be unable to > send changes as meaningful text

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-02-14 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 13, Julien Grall wrote: > > > > > > > Regarding the format. Does ODT will allow git to do proper diff? > > > > > > There is flat ODT, "Safe as ..."

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-02-14 Thread Olaf Hering
On Tue, Jan 17, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Olaf Hering wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 13, Julien Grall wrote: > > > > > Regarding the format. Does ODT will allow git to do proper diff? > > > > There is flat ODT, "Safe as ..." and pick the better format from the > > pulldown menu.

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-01-17 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, Julien Grall wrote: > > > Regarding the format. Does ODT will allow git to do proper diff? > > There is flat ODT, "Safe as ..." and pick the better format from the pulldown > menu. Sounds like a good idea. Can you submit a patch?

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-01-17 Thread Olaf Hering
On Fri, Jan 13, Julien Grall wrote: > Regarding the format. Does ODT will allow git to do proper diff? There is flat ODT, "Safe as ..." and pick the better format from the pulldown menu. Olaf signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-01-17 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 17/01/17 04:55, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 16/01/17 19:40, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Ian Jackson wrote: >>> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: STAO spec in xen.git"): In that case, I think we should still commit it as ODT, but convert it automatically to PDF when

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-01-16 Thread Juergen Gross
On 16/01/17 19:40, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Ian Jackson wrote: >> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: STAO spec in xen.git"): >>> In that case, I think we should still commit it as ODT, but convert it >>> automatically to PDF when we publish it (we do something similar with >>>

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-01-16 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Ian Jackson wrote: > Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: STAO spec in xen.git"): > > In that case, I think we should still commit it as ODT, but convert it > > automatically to PDF when we publish it (we do something similar with > > the markdown docs, converting them from

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-01-16 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:26:57AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: STAO spec in xen.git"): > > In that case, I think we should still commit it as ODT, but convert it > > automatically to PDF when we publish it (we do something similar with > > the markdown docs,

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-01-16 Thread Ian Jackson
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: STAO spec in xen.git"): > In that case, I think we should still commit it as ODT, but convert it > automatically to PDF when we publish it (we do something similar with > the markdown docs, converting them from markdown to html). Exactly. The fact that git diff

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-01-13 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, Al Stone wrote: > On 01/13/2017 12:52 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, Ian Jackson wrote: > >> Stefano Stabellini writes ("STAO spec in xen.git"): > >>> I suggest we commit the STAO spec in the form of the attached ODT > >>> document to xen.git under

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-01-13 Thread Al Stone
On 01/13/2017 12:52 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, Ian Jackson wrote: >> Stefano Stabellini writes ("STAO spec in xen.git"): >>> I suggest we commit the STAO spec in the form of the attached ODT >>> document to xen.git under docs/misc, for easier editing and consumption >>>

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-01-13 Thread Stefano Stabellini
eorge.dun...@eu.citrix.com; > andrew.coop...@citrix.com; t...@xen.org; Julien > Grall; jbeul...@suse.com; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; > parth.di...@linaro.org; roger@citrix.com > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git   > Stefano Stabellini writes ("STAO spec in xen.gi

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-01-13 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, Ian Jackson wrote: > Stefano Stabellini writes ("STAO spec in xen.git"): > > I suggest we commit the STAO spec in the form of the attached ODT > > document to xen.git under docs/misc, for easier editing and consumption > > by the Xen community, and to be able to generate a

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-01-13 Thread Julien Grall
.com Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git Stefano Stabellini writes ("STAO spec in xen.git"): > I suggest we commit the STAO spec in the form of the attached ODT > document to xen.git under docs/misc, for easier editing and consumption > by the Xen community, and to b

Re: [Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-01-13 Thread Ian Jackson
Stefano Stabellini writes ("STAO spec in xen.git"): > I suggest we commit the STAO spec in the form of the attached ODT > document to xen.git under docs/misc, for easier editing and consumption > by the Xen community, and to be able to generate a stable URL for it. In > fact at the moment the link

[Xen-devel] STAO spec in xen.git

2017-01-13 Thread Stefano Stabellini
Hi all, I suggest we commit the STAO spec in the form of the attached ODT document to xen.git under docs/misc, for easier editing and consumption by the Xen community, and to be able to generate a stable URL for it. In fact at the moment the link to the STAO spec from http://uefi.org/acpi is