On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 09:59:11AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 15.02.16 at 17:10, wrote:
> > El 15/2/16 a les 17:00, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ha escrit:
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> I wanted to ask what folks would think of expanding the Wiki to include
> > (making it a diff
>
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 16:04 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> andrewcoop@andrewcoop:/local/xen.git/xen$ dig -t ANY doe.com
> ...
> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> doe.com.3600INNSns52.domaincontrol.com.
> doe.com.3600INNSns51.domaincontrol.com.
>
> ;; ADDITIONAL
>>> On 15.02.16 at 17:10, wrote:
> El 15/2/16 a les 17:00, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ha escrit:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I wanted to ask what folks would think of expanding the Wiki to include
> (making it a diff
>> for simpler) this change. With my giant 30 set of patches that not only
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:00:58AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I wanted to ask what folks would think of expanding the Wiki to include
> (making it a diff
> for simpler) this change. With my giant 30 set of patches that not only CC-ed
> xen-devel twice but had some patches CC
El 15/2/16 a les 17:00, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ha escrit:
> Hey,
>
> I wanted to ask what folks would think of expanding the Wiki to include
> (making it a diff
> for simpler) this change. With my giant 30 set of patches that not only CC-ed
> xen-devel twice but had some patches CC some
On 15/02/16 16:00, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I wanted to ask what folks would think of expanding the Wiki to include
> (making it a diff
> for simpler) this change. With my giant 30 set of patches that not only CC-ed
> xen-devel twice but had some patches CC some maintainers but not
Hey,
I wanted to ask what folks would think of expanding the Wiki to include (making
it a diff
for simpler) this change. With my giant 30 set of patches that not only CC-ed
xen-devel twice but had some patches CC some maintainers but not others - I
figured
it may be good to describe this in the