Am Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:40:34 +0100
schrieb Andrew Cooper :
> On 22/03/17 10:59, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 22, Olaf Hering wrote:
> >
> >> Did the xc_shadow_control API change at some point?
> > ... staging-4.5 works, while staging-4.6 does not.
>
> Can
On 22/03/17 10:59, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
>> Did the xc_shadow_control API change at some point?
> ... staging-4.5 works, while staging-4.6 does not.
Can you describe in a little more detail what you are testing?
I have tried reproducing your scenario, and I
On Wed, Mar 22, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Did the xc_shadow_control API change at some point?
... staging-4.5 works, while staging-4.6 does not.
Olaf
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
On 22/03/17 10:46, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
>> I wonder if the usage of xc_shadow_control is correct. The testing was
>> done with a xen-4.4 based dom0, I will verify with staging once I find
>> the time.
> It does work with xen-4.4, but fails with staging.
> Did
On Tue, Mar 21, Olaf Hering wrote:
> I wonder if the usage of xc_shadow_control is correct. The testing was
> done with a xen-4.4 based dom0, I will verify with staging once I find
> the time.
It does work with xen-4.4, but fails with staging.
Did the xc_shadow_control API change at some point?
To measure how many dirty pages a domU creates within a timeframe the
attached tool was created, based on code from xc_domain_save.
Once the domU touches many pages the reported dirty rate is high, but
after a few seconds the rate drops down from thousands to just a few dozen.
I wonder if the