Ian Campbell writes ("Re: libxl and malloc failure (Re: [Xen-devel] Current
LibXL Status)"):
> On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 18:15 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Current LibXL Status"):
> > > Languages such as OCaml us
graft 51 ^
thanks
On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 18:15 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Current LibXL Status"):
> > There really is a show-stopper, which I have stated before.
> >
> > Languages such as OCaml use -ENOMEM as a hint to run the garbage
> > collector some
Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Current LibXL Status"):
> There really is a show-stopper, which I have stated before.
>
> Languages such as OCaml use -ENOMEM as a hint to run the garbage
> collector some more. I expect Haskell is the same.
This cannot possibly be true (if what you mean
