Re: [Xen-devel] Patch ping

2016-04-29 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 29/04/16 17:03, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > Hello, > > Just for my internal patch book-keeping, I assume this patch did not get > into staging because of the code freeze and is planned for 4.8? > > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-04/msg01444.html That fix should go into 4.7, but

[Xen-devel] Patch ping

2016-04-29 Thread Razvan Cojocaru
Hello, Just for my internal patch book-keeping, I assume this patch did not get into staging because of the code freeze and is planned for 4.8? http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-04/msg01444.html Thanks, Razvan ___ Xen-devel mailing

Re: [Xen-devel] patch ping

2016-03-30 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 29.03.16 at 19:34, wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 06:21:40AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> REST maintainers, >> >> may I please ask for acks or otherwise on >> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg03193.html > > Could you resend the

[Xen-devel] patch ping

2016-03-29 Thread Jan Beulich
REST maintainers, may I please ask for acks or otherwise on http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg03193.html (v2 of patch 2: http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg02804.html)

Re: [Xen-devel] patch ping

2016-02-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Jan Beulich writes ("patch ping"): > REST maintainers, > > may I ask for an ack or otherwise for > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg01956.html > , which is basically a follow-up to the above (and will need [trivial] > re-basing before committing)? I see no problem

Re: [Xen-devel] patch ping

2016-02-22 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Jan Beulich wrote: > ARM maintainers, > > may I ask for an ack or otherwise for > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg01207.html On that patch: Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini > along with a statement whether

[Xen-devel] patch ping

2016-02-22 Thread Jan Beulich
ARM maintainers, may I ask for an ack or otherwise for http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg01207.html along with a statement whether the ARM side alignment should also be reduced, just like settled on for x86 in

Re: [Xen-devel] patch ping

2015-01-05 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 01:13:41PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 01:48:18PM +, Jan Beulich wrote: Konrad, any word on http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg01253.html Release-Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

[Xen-devel] patch ping

2014-12-19 Thread Jan Beulich
Konrad, any word on http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg01253.html http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg01370.html http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg01485.html sent several days ago (there were more earlier today)

Re: [Xen-devel] patch ping

2014-12-19 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 01:48:18PM +, Jan Beulich wrote: Konrad, any word on http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg01253.html Release-Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg01370.html