On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 04:44:30PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> All,
>
> on the hackathon we discussed this topic. With the rate of changes
> going into the stable trees not being as high anymore as a few
> years ago, we settled on trying to stick to a 4 month release
> cycle going forward. Of cour
> On 5 May 2015, at 16:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> All,
>
> on the hackathon we discussed this topic. With the rate of changes
> going into the stable trees not being as high anymore as a few
> years ago, we settled on trying to stick to a 4 month release
> cycle going forward.
+1
Lars
_
All,
on the hackathon we discussed this topic. With the rate of changes
going into the stable trees not being as high anymore as a few
years ago, we settled on trying to stick to a 4 month release
cycle going forward. Of course, issues like the currently severely
lagging osstest can always lead to
