On 19-12-2014 22:23, Herbert Xu wrote:
David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com wrote:
After d75b1ade567ffab085e8adbbdacf0092d10cd09c (net: less interrupt
masking in NAPI) the napi instance is removed from the per-cpu list
prior to calling the n-poll(), and is only requeued if all of the
budget was
On 12/20/2014 08:23 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com wrote:
After d75b1ade567ffab085e8adbbdacf0092d10cd09c (net: less interrupt
masking in NAPI) the napi instance is removed from the per-cpu list
prior to calling the n-poll(), and is only requeued if all of the
From: Herbert Xu herb...@gondor.apana.org.au
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:23:27 +1100
The commit d75b1ade567ffab085e8adbbdacf0092d10cd09c (net: less
interrupt masking in NAPI) breaks virtio_net in an insidious way.
It is now required that if the entire budget is consumed when poll
returns, the
David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com wrote:
After d75b1ade567ffab085e8adbbdacf0092d10cd09c (net: less interrupt
masking in NAPI) the napi instance is removed from the per-cpu list
prior to calling the n-poll(), and is only requeued if all of the
budget was used. This inadvertently broke
