On 1/27/16 9:18 AM, Lars Kurth wrote:
>
> Sorry, I have been a little bit unresponsive. Things were a little hectic
> in the last 2 weeks.
>
>
> On 27/01/2016 11:21, "George Dunlap" wrote:
>
>>
>>> FWIW, I am +1 for setting up infrastructure like this, but lets do
On 27/01/16 15:45, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 15:18 +, Lars Kurth wrote:
>>> Doug says that you can mark a repo as a 'mirror', which will prevent
>>> people from being able to send pull requests to it; so I think my
>>> technical objection has been answered.
>>>
>>> I think
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 15:18 +, Lars Kurth wrote:
> > Doug says that you can mark a repo as a 'mirror', which will prevent
> > people from being able to send pull requests to it; so I think my
> > technical objection has been answered.
> >
> > I think the idea is still only half-baked though,
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 16:01 +, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 27/01/16 15:45, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > For most patch series setting up a GH account and pushing the changes to it
> > etc is pure overhead (or at least optional), there is no need to encourage
> > it for most series, nor even
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On 27/01/16 09:45, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 11:26 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>>> On 1/26/16 10:55 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 14:51 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 11:26 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On 1/26/16 10:55 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 14:51 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > Now I'll start off by saying that "no" is a perfectly acceptable answer
> > > to this suggestion. Basically I
On 27/01/16 09:45, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 11:26 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>> On 1/26/16 10:55 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 14:51 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote:
All,
Now I'll start off by saying that "no" is a perfectly acceptable answer
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>> If forking the repo significantly easier than just creating an empty one of
>> your own and pushing to it? Is the parent repo "important" in some way in
>> the GH world? (Given that, as George says, we are unlikely to
Sorry, I have been a little bit unresponsive. Things were a little hectic
in the last 2 weeks.
On 27/01/2016 11:21, "George Dunlap" wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I am +1 for setting up infrastructure like this, but lets do it
>> properly.
>>
>> Lars: Thoughts?
I don't mind
On 12/23/15 2:53 AM, Jon Ludlam wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:54:52AM +, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Now I'll start off by saying that "no" is a perfectly acceptable answer
>>> to this suggestion.
On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 14:51 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> All,
>
> Now I'll start off by saying that "no" is a perfectly acceptable answer
> to this suggestion. Basically I remember at the Xen Developer Summit a
> few people mentioned it being nice if people provided a git tree where
> their
On 1/26/16 10:55 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 14:51 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> Now I'll start off by saying that "no" is a perfectly acceptable answer
>> to this suggestion. Basically I remember at the Xen Developer Summit a
>> few people mentioned it being nice
On 1/26/16 11:26 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On 1/26/16 10:55 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 14:51 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Now I'll start off by saying that "no" is a perfectly acceptable answer
>>> to this suggestion. Basically I remember at the Xen
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:54:52AM +, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Now I'll start off by saying that "no" is a perfectly acceptable answer
> > to this suggestion. Basically I remember at the Xen Developer
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> All,
>
> Now I'll start off by saying that "no" is a perfectly acceptable answer
> to this suggestion. Basically I remember at the Xen Developer Summit a
> few people mentioned it being nice if people provided a git tree
All,
Now I'll start off by saying that "no" is a perfectly acceptable answer
to this suggestion. Basically I remember at the Xen Developer Summit a
few people mentioned it being nice if people provided a git tree where
their branches were available for testing. I was just thinking it might
be
16 matches
Mail list logo