On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 01:31 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 22.09.17 at 19:20, wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
>
> Would you mind clarifying in a brief description whether this is just
> routine catch up, or to bring in
>>> On 22.09.17 at 19:20, wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
Would you mind clarifying in a brief description whether this is just
routine catch up, or to bring in any specific changes we need?
Jan
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:08:45PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 10:06 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > The new osstest tested head contains a fix for gcc-4.4 toolchain.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
> > ---
> > Cc: "Hao, Xudong"
> > Cc:
On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 10:06 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> The new osstest tested head contains a fix for gcc-4.4 toolchain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
> ---
> Cc: "Hao, Xudong"
> Cc: Ian Campbell
>
> Please pull from
>
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 02:01 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 22.10.15 at 19:08, wrote:
> > Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF
> > changeset"):
> > > On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > This was discussed prior to Wei
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
> > On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > Yes. Those (that?) and the reasons why we aren't just trivially taking
> > > them
> > > are explained in the referenced thread.
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 02:01 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > On 22.10.15 at 19:08, wrote:
> > > Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF
> > > changeset"):
> > > > On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell
Il 23/10/2015 14:56, Ian Campbell ha scritto:
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 13:43 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
We have no existing stable baseline for that arch, and no testing or
reason to believe that cb9a7eb (the Config.mk version currently
referenced by 4.6) as being any good at all on that
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 15:16 +0200, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
> A recent ovmf patch (already tested) I think is good to backport is:
Pointing out backport candidates in the depths of a thread such as this is
a sure fire way to ensure they get missed I'm afraid.
Please make such requests explicitly in
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 12:18 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF
> > changeset"):
> > > On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > Yes. Those (that?) and the reasons why we aren't just
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Yes. Those (that?) and the reasons why we aren't just trivially taking them
> > are explained in the referenced thread.
That explanation isn't very convincing to me.
> I
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > If OVMF upstream do not have such a branch, we need to create one.
>
> That's fine. We need the new branch in osstest and somebody maintaining
> it.
Creating a push gate in
>>> On 23.10.15 at 13:18, wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
>> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> > Yes. Those (that?) and the reasons why we aren't just trivially taking them
>> > are explained in the
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 12:18 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF
> changeset"):
> > On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > Yes. Those (that?) and the reasons why we aren't just trivially
> > > taking them
> > > are explained in the
>>> On 22.10.15 at 19:08, wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> > This was discussed prior to Wei submitting this patch, but I can't remember
>> > the reference. Hopefully
On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 12:41 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
Acked + applied.
Ian, I beleive Stefano would like to see this in 4.6 at some point.
> ---
> Please pull from
>
> git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/ovmf.git xen-tested-master
>
> and push the
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 04:58:52PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
> > On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 12:41 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
> >
> > Acked + applied.
> >
> > Ian, I beleive Stefano
On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 16:58 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
> > On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 12:41 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
> >
> > Acked + applied.
> >
> > Ian, I beleive Stefano would
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 16:58 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
> > > On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 12:41 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
> > >
> > > Acked
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > This was discussed prior to Wei submitting this patch, but I can't remember
> > the reference. Hopefully either Wei or Stefano does.
>
> 1444832748.23192.213.ca...@citrix.com
20 matches
Mail list logo