>>> On 09.11.15 at 15:24, wrote:
> On 09/11/15 14:20, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 07:11 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 09.11.15 at 15:01, wrote:
SPIs are too numerous and not indivcidually as interesting.
Make the exists #IPIS counter x86 specific.
>>>
>>> I'd
Hi,
On 09/11/15 14:20, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 07:11 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.11.15 at 15:01, wrote:
>>> SPIs are too numerous and not indivcidually as interesting.
>>>
>>> Make the exists #IPIS counter x86 specific.
>>
>> I'd recommend not to - even if ARM doesn'
On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 07:11 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 09.11.15 at 15:01, wrote:
> > SPIs are too numerous and not indivcidually as interesting.
> >
> > Make the exists #IPIS counter x86 specific.
>
> I'd recommend not to - even if ARM doesn't want to use it, it's still a
> pretty gene
>>> On 09.11.15 at 15:01, wrote:
> SPIs are too numerous and not indivcidually as interesting.
>
> Make the exists #IPIS counter x86 specific.
I'd recommend not to - even if ARM doesn't want to use it, it's still a
pretty generic thing.
Jan
___
Xen-
