Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] libxl: set disk defaults in
remove/destroy functions"):
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 06:06:15PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Something like this perhaps, yes. Although it seems to have rather
> > too much
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 06:06:15PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] libxl: set disk defaults in
> remove/destroy functions"):
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 04:38:00PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > libxl_device_disk_remove sh
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] libxl: set disk defaults in
remove/destroy functions"):
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 04:38:00PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > libxl_device_disk_remove should definitely not require the caller to
> > do what xl currently does.
>
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 04:38:00PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] libxl: set disk defaults in
> remove/destroy functions"):
> > FWIW xl block-detach calls libxl_vdev_to_device_disk to convert a vdev
> > to disk. That functi
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] libxl: set disk defaults in
remove/destroy functions"):
> FWIW xl block-detach calls libxl_vdev_to_device_disk to convert a vdev
> to disk. That function reads xenstore to get the actual backend of that
> specific vdev. Don't
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:27:13PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 16:14 -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>
> Cc-ing the other toolstack maintainers, both of whom have more
> familiarity with this part of libxl than I.
>
> > The attached patch is a hack I cooked up to fix one of the li
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] libxl: set disk defaults in
remove/destroy functions"):
> Perhaps better would be to add a new parameter to0 DEFINE_DEVICE_REMOVE
> like extra_setdefault_args which is pasted in the appropriate place?
I don't think this is
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 13:27 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 16:14 -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>
> Cc-ing the other toolstack maintainers, both of whom have more
> familiarity with this part of libxl than I.
>
> > The attached patch is a hack I cooked up to fix one of the libvirt-T
On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 16:14 -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
Cc-ing the other toolstack maintainers, both of whom have more
familiarity with this part of libxl than I.
> The attached patch is a hack I cooked up to fix one of the libvirt-TCK
> Xen failures. The test (200-disk-hotplug.t) attempts to hot a
