On 16.04.15 at 20:21, konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
What kernel are you using? Or better yet - what branch/tree could
one find it at?
As always, I'm personally using my own kernel, not in any branch/tree.
But for all purposes here, our Kernel-of-the-Day should be good
enough, i.e. the stuff
On 15.04.15 at 19:41, konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:05:14AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.04.15 at 22:02, konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 04:39:49PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
As done in Linux by f598282f51 (PCI: Fix the NIU MSI-X problem
On 15.04.15 at 19:41, konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:05:14AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
You mentioning XSA-120 and its addendum - are these requirements
for the problem to be seen? I admit I may have tested a PV guest
only with an SR-IOV VF (and only a HVM guest also
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 08:43:30AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.04.15 at 19:41, konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:05:14AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
You mentioning XSA-120 and its addendum - are these requirements
for the problem to be seen? I admit I may have
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:05:14AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.04.15 at 22:02, konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 04:39:49PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
As done in Linux by f598282f51 (PCI: Fix the NIU MSI-X problem in a
better way) and its broken predecessor, make
On 10.04.15 at 22:02, konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 04:39:49PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
As done in Linux by f598282f51 (PCI: Fix the NIU MSI-X problem in a
better way) and its broken predecessor, make sure we don't access the
MSI-X table without having enabled MSI-X
