Hi Ian,
On 20/02/15 15:52, Ian Campbell wrote:
As DOM0 will get most the devices, the vIRQ is equal to the IRQ in that case.
Am I correct that after this patch all callers still pass irq==virq to
the new function?
Sorry, I forgot to answer to this question. Yes, all the callers will
pass
On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 14:33 +, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Ian,
On 20/02/15 17:09, Julien Grall wrote:
On 20/02/15 15:52, Ian Campbell wrote:
action = xmalloc(struct irqaction);
-if (!action)
+if ( !action )
+return -ENOMEM;
+
+info = xmalloc(struct
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 14:25 +, Julien Grall wrote:
Actually Xen is assuming that the virtual IRQ will always be the same as IRQ.
s/Actually/Currently/?
Modify route_guest_irq to take the virtual IRQ in parameter and let Xen
assign a different IRQ number.
I think I must be
On 20/02/15 15:52, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 14:25 +, Julien Grall wrote:
Actually Xen is assuming that the virtual IRQ will always be the same as IRQ.
s/Actually/Currently/?
Yes, I always mix both because the former is close to the french word.
Modify route_guest_irq
On 28/01/15 16:56, Julien Grall wrote:
On 28/01/15 16:47, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/irq.c b/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
index 25ecf1d..830832c 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
@@ -31,6 +31,13 @@
static unsigned int local_irqs_type[NR_LOCAL_IRQS];
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
Actually Xen is assuming that the virtual IRQ will always be the same as IRQ.
Modify route_guest_irq to take the virtual IRQ in parameter and let Xen
assign a different IRQ number. Also store the vIRQ in the desc action to
easily retrieve easily the
On 28/01/15 16:47, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/irq.c b/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
index 25ecf1d..830832c 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
@@ -31,6 +31,13 @@
static unsigned int local_irqs_type[NR_LOCAL_IRQS];
static
