On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 06:00:47AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.07.16 at 12:27, wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 12:55:42AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 05.07.16 at 20:33, wrote:
> >> > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:16:09AM
>>> On 06.07.16 at 12:27, wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 12:55:42AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 05.07.16 at 20:33, wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:16:09AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 25.05.16 at 18:45,
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 12:55:42AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 05.07.16 at 20:33, wrote:
> > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:16:09AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 25.05.16 at 18:45, wrote:
> >> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 01:03:42AM
>>> On 05.07.16 at 20:33, wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:16:09AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 25.05.16 at 18:45, wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 01:03:42AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 15.04.16 at 14:33,
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:16:09AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 25.05.16 at 18:45, wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 01:03:42AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 15.04.16 at 14:33, wrote:
> >> > Existing solution does not allocate
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:16:09AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 25.05.16 at 18:45, wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 01:03:42AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 15.04.16 at 14:33, wrote:
> >> > Existing solution does not allocate
>>> On 25.05.16 at 18:45, wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 01:03:42AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 15.04.16 at 14:33, wrote:
>> > Existing solution does not allocate space for this symbol and any
>> > references to acpi20, etc. does not
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 01:03:42AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 15.04.16 at 14:33, wrote:
> > Existing solution does not allocate space for this symbol and any
> > references to acpi20, etc. does not make sense. As I saw any efi.*
> > references are protected by
>>> On 15.04.16 at 14:33, wrote:
> Existing solution does not allocate space for this symbol and any
> references to acpi20, etc. does not make sense. As I saw any efi.*
> references are protected by relevant ifs but we should not do that
> because it makes code very