On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 17:51 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 22/10/15 17:07, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c
> > > index 665afeb..6b7eab3 100644
> > > --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c
> > > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c
> > > @@ -50,6 +50,94 @@ void
Hi Ian,
On 23/10/15 10:30, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 17:51 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 22/10/15 17:07, Ian Campbell wrote:
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c
index 665afeb..6b7eab3 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c
+++
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 10:37 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 23/10/15 10:30, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 17:51 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > On 22/10/15 17:07, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c
> > > > >
On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 15:22 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> The current implementation ignores the whole write if one of the field is
> 0. Although, based on the spec (4.3.12 IHI 0048B.b), 0 is a valid value
> when:
> - The interrupt is not wired in the distributor. From the Xen
> point of
On 22/10/15 17:07, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c
>> index 665afeb..6b7eab3 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c
>> @@ -50,6 +50,94 @@ void vgic_v2_setup_hw(paddr_t dbase, paddr_t cbase,
>> paddr_t vbase)
>>
