Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader

2015-03-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 03.03.15 at 00:40, roy.fr...@linaro.org wrote: Reviewing the #ifndef CONFIG_ARM in EFI code, and the efi_enabled usage elsewhere, the remaining EFI tasks on ARM look like: * Support for SetVirtualAddressMap * Runtime service support - looks like just time function used by x86 in

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 17/18] x86/efi: create new early memory allocator

2015-03-03 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:04:09AM +, Jan Beulich wrote: On 02.03.15 at 21:25, roy.fr...@linaro.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com wrote: On 30.01.15 at 18:54, daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote: @@ -192,12 +218,7 @@ static void __init

[Xen-devel] kasan_map_early_shadow() on Xen

2015-03-03 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
Andrey, I believe that on Xen we should disable kasan, would like confirmation from someone on xen-devel though. Here's the thing though -- if true -- I'd like to do it *properly*, where *properly* means addressing a bit of architecture. A simple Kconfig slap seems rather reactive. I'd like to

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] Add flag to start info regarding virtual mapped p2m list

2015-03-03 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 03/03/15 09:29, Juergen Gross wrote: In order to indicate the Xen tools capability to support the virtual mapped linear p2m list instead the 3 level mfn tree add a flag to the start_info page. Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross jgr...@suse.com Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1] xen/arm: Do not allocate pte entries for MAP_SMALL_PAGES

2015-03-03 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 13:28 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Julien Grall julien.gr...@linaro.org wrote: On 24/02/15 10:26, Ian Campbell wrote: On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 09:38 +, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Ian, On 24/02/2015 09:31, Ian Campbell wrote: On Wed,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 11/13] test_x86_emulator.c: Add emacs block

2015-03-03 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 03/03/15 14:28, Ian Campbell wrote: On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 14:52 +, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 16/02/15 23:05, Don Slutz wrote: Signed-off-by: Don Slutz dsl...@verizon.com Acked-by: Andrew Cooper andew.coo...@citrix.com (Presuming an acceptable extension of maintainership into this area.

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] vNUMA: validate XEN_DOMCTL_setvnumainfo input

2015-03-03 Thread Jan Beulich
As we get ready to use the information set for a domain here we should make sure it is actually valid: Both vNode and pNode numbers should be in range. Do a little bit of other cleanup so the code ends up looking reasonably consistent in style. Along with this goes that we don't need an array of

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] domctl: cleanup

2015-03-03 Thread Jan Beulich
- drop redundant ret = 0 statements - drop unnecessary braces - eliminate a few single use local variables - move break statements inside case-specific braced scopes Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com --- a/xen/common/domctl.c +++ b/xen/common/domctl.c @@ -517,8 +517,8 @@ long

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 2/4] xen/arm: Check for interrupt controller directly

2015-03-03 Thread Julien Grall
Hello Frediano, On 03/03/15 11:19, Frediano Ziglio wrote: This check allow to detect mail interrupt controller even if it does main not match one of the standard ones. This allow boards with non standard controllers to be handled correctly without having to manually edit the global list

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] vNUMA: validate XEN_DOMCTL_setvnumainfo input

2015-03-03 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 02:38:19PM +, Jan Beulich wrote: As we get ready to use the information set for a domain here we should make sure it is actually valid: Both vNode and pNode numbers should be in range. Do a little bit of other cleanup so the code ends up looking reasonably

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] domctl: cleanup

2015-03-03 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 14:40 +, Jan Beulich wrote: - drop redundant ret = 0 statements - drop unnecessary braces - eliminate a few single use local variables - move break statements inside case-specific braced scopes Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com Acked-by: Ian Campbell

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] vNUMA: validate XEN_DOMCTL_setvnumainfo input

2015-03-03 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 14:46 +, Wei Liu wrote: On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 02:38:19PM +, Jan Beulich wrote: As we get ready to use the information set for a domain here we should make sure it is actually valid: Both vNode and pNode numbers should be in range. Do a little bit of other

<    1   2   3