[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 106608: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 106608 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106608/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13 saverestore-support-checkfail like 106562 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 106610: regressions - FAIL

flight 106610 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106610/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 105963

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-coverity test] 106616: regressions - ALL FAIL

flight 106616 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106616/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: coverity-amd646 coverity-upload fail REGR. vs. 106549 version

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus bisection] complete build-amd64-pvops

branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job build-amd64-pvops testid kernel-build Tree: linux git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git *** Found and reproduced problem changeset *** Bug is in

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 106605: tolerable FAIL

flight 106605 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106605/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 16 guest-stopfail like 106593

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 106617: regressions - FAIL

flight 106617 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106617/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 105963

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 106612: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 106612 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106612/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 3 host-install(3)broken REGR. vs. 59254

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline baseline-only test] 68670: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68670 qemu-mainline real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68670/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf-pvops 3

[Xen-devel] [distros-debian-stretch test] 68671: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 68671 distros-debian-stretch real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68671/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf-pvops 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 68634

[Xen-devel] [GSoC] GSoC Introduction : Fuzzing Xen hypercall interface

Hi, I’m interested in the “Fuzzing Xen hypercall interface” project so I just wanted to introduce myself: I’m a third-year undergraduate CS student at Jacobs University in Bremen, Germany. It’s a rather small university and rather young but quite successful in the national rankings (*brag*).

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 106624: regressions - FAIL

flight 106624 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106624/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 105963

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 09/24] x86: refactor psr: set value: assemble features value array.

On 17-03-10 02:15:20, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 10.03.17 at 04:21, wrote: > > On 17-03-08 09:54:04, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 15.02.17 at 09:49, wrote: > >> > @@ -207,6 +233,29 @@ static enum psr_feat_type > >> >

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 106623: regressions - FAIL

flight 106623 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106623/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 59254

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 04/24] x86: refactor psr: implement CPU init and free flow.

On 17-03-10 01:56:04, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 10.03.17 at 02:32, wrote: > > On 17-03-08 07:56:54, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 15.02.17 at 09:49, wrote: [...] > >> > +if ( !cpu_has(_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_PQE) ) > >> > >> Do you

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 08/24] x86: refactor psr: set value: implement framework.

On 17-03-10 02:09:55, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 10.03.17 at 03:54, wrote: > > On 17-03-08 09:07:10, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 15.02.17 at 09:49, wrote: > >> > +static int write_psr_msr(unsigned int socket, unsigned int cos, > >> > +

[Xen-devel] [Question] About the behavior of HLT in VMX guest mode

Hi guys, I'm confusing about the behavior of HLT instruction in VMX guest mode. I set "hlt exiting" bit to 0 in VMCS, and the vcpu didn't vmexit when execute HLT as expected. However, I used powertop/cpupower on host to watch the pcpu's c-states, it seems that the pcpu didn't enter C1/C1E state

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable baseline-only test] 68669: trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68669 xen-unstable real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68669/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf-xsm

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 106626: regressions - FAIL

flight 106626 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106626/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 105963