Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-scsiback: some modifications about code comment

2015-02-08 Thread Juergen Gross
On 02/07/2015 04:31 AM, Rudy Zhang wrote: From: Tao Chen Signed-off-by: Tao Chen Are some white space fixes in comments really worth a patch? Juergen --- drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c | 16 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-scsi

Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [v2][PATCH] libxl: add one machine property to support IGD GFX passthrough

2015-02-08 Thread Chen, Tiejun
On 2015/2/6 9:01, Chen, Tiejun wrote: On 2015/2/5 17:52, Ian Campbell wrote: On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 09:22 +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote: Indeed this is not something workaround, and I think in any type of VGA devices, we'd like to diminish this sort of thing gradually, right? This mightn't come tru

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen's Linux kernel config options v3

2015-02-08 Thread Juergen Gross
On 02/07/2015 12:44 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: This is a third respin for a design proposal for a rework on the config options on the Linux kernel related to Xen. The frist two proposals came from Juergen, I'm taking on the work now as some other work I am doing is related to this. This third i

Re: [Xen-devel] pvSCSI test

2015-02-08 Thread Juergen Gross
On 02/06/2015 09:33 PM, Kristian Hagsted Rasmussen wrote: On Friday, February 6, 2015 15:25, Juergen Gross wrote: To: Kristian Hagsted Rasmussen; Olaf Hering; xen-de...@lists.xensource.com Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] pvSCSI test After some more fiddling around, I believe the configuration sho

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 08/27] ArmVirtualizationPkg: add padding to FDT allocation

2015-02-08 Thread Olivier Martin
Reviewed-By: Olivier Martin From: Ard Biesheuvel [ard.biesheu...@linaro.org] Sent: 03 February 2015 19:19 To: edk2-de...@lists.sourceforge.net; ler...@redhat.com; Olivier Martin; roy.fr...@linaro.org; leif.lindh...@linaro.org; stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 07/27] ArmVirtualizationPkg: use a HOB to store device tree blob

2015-02-08 Thread Olivier Martin
Reviewed-By: Olivier Martin From: Ard Biesheuvel [ard.biesheu...@linaro.org] Sent: 03 February 2015 19:19 To: edk2-de...@lists.sourceforge.net; ler...@redhat.com; Olivier Martin; roy.fr...@linaro.org; leif.lindh...@linaro.org; stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] sched: credit2: respect per-vcpu hard affinity

2015-02-08 Thread Justin T. Weaver
From: "Justin T. Weaver" by making sure that vcpus only run on the pcpu(s) they are allowed to run on based on their hard affinity cpu masks. Signed-off-by: Justin T. Weaver --- Changes in v2: * Added dynamically allocated cpu masks to avoid putting them on the stack; replaced temp masks fr

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen: arm32: reduce default size of the xenheap

2015-02-08 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Ian, On 05/02/2015 23:34, Ian Campbell wrote: On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 22:01 +0800, Julien Grall wrote: If the user requests a xenheap of 0MB, we will use the default size, right? It may be worth to explain this case. I think it's pretty generally understood that 0 generally means the default

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] modify the IO_TLB_SEGSIZE to io_tlb_segsize configurable as flexible requirement about SW-IOMMU.

2015-02-08 Thread Wang, Xiaoming
Dear Wilk: > -Original Message- > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.w...@oracle.com] > Sent: Saturday, February 7, 2015 2:12 AM > To: Wang, Xiaoming > Cc: r...@linux-mips.org; boris.ostrov...@oracle.com; > david.vra...@citrix.com; linux-m...@linux-mips.org; linux- > ker...@vger.ke

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.10 test] 34291: regressions - FAIL

2015-02-08 Thread xen . org
flight 34291 linux-3.10 real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34291/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 26303 Regressions which are

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions

2015-02-08 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
On 02/06/2015 06:49 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote: > Paravirt spinlock clears slowpath flag after doing unlock. > As explained by Linus currently it does: > prev = *lock; > add_smp(&lock->tickets.head, TICKET_LOCK_INC); > > /* add_smp() is a full mb() */

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 34292: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

2015-02-08 Thread xen . org
flight 34292 libvirt real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34292/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-i386-libvirt 10 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 10 migrate-sup

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/ocaml: remove uint32 use added by 674ad2b

2015-02-08 Thread Dave Scott
> On 8 Feb 2015, at 17:11, M A Young wrote: > > From 73bab9cb1cb95f35080fadaf1193cbe45327a89c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Michael Young > Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 15:54:23 + > Subject: [PATCH] tools/ocaml: remove uint32 use added by 674ad2b > > In 674ad2b (xenstore: extend the xenstore r

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.16 test] 34285: regressions - FAIL

2015-02-08 Thread xen . org
flight 34285 linux-3.16 real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34285/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 15 guest-localmigrate/x10fail REGR. vs. 34167 Regressions which are

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions

2015-02-08 Thread Raghavendra K T
On 02/07/2015 12:27 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: On 02/06/2015 09:49 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote: Paravirt spinlock clears slowpath flag after doing unlock. As explained by Linus currently it does: prev = *lock; add_smp(&lock->tickets.head, TICKET_LOCK_INC);

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions

2015-02-08 Thread Raghavendra K T
On 02/06/2015 09:55 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote: Paravirt spinlock clears slowpath flag after doing unlock. [ fix edited out ] So I'm not going to be applying this for 3.19, because it's much too late and the patch is too scary. Plus the bug

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions

2015-02-08 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 02/06, Sasha Levin wrote: > > Can we modify it slightly to avoid potentially accessing invalid memory: > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h > index 5315887..cd22d73 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/ocaml: remove uint32 use added by 674ad2b

2015-02-08 Thread M A Young
>From 73bab9cb1cb95f35080fadaf1193cbe45327a89c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Young Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 15:54:23 + Subject: [PATCH] tools/ocaml: remove uint32 use added by 674ad2b In 674ad2b (xenstore: extend the xenstore ring with a 'closing' signal) two uses of uint32 are added to

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 34278: regressions - FAIL

2015-02-08 Thread xen . org
flight 34278 ovmf real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34278/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 7 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 33686 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovm

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 test] 34268: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2015-02-08 Thread xen . org
flight 34268 linux-3.14 real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34268/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-pair17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail like 34092 Tests which did not succeed, bu

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 07/35] ACPI / ACPICA: Add new features for MADT which introduced by ACPI 5.1

2015-02-08 Thread Tomasz Nowicki
Hi Parth, I see lots of old code where some of the issues were already solved in latest one. Can you please rebase your patches on top of latest ACPI core set and compose xen specific patches as separate? That would simplify review process and allows to see the delta. Regards, Tomasz On 02/

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-unstable test] 34247: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

2015-02-08 Thread xen . org
flight 34247 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34247/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 11 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 33488 test-amd64

[Xen-devel] [linux-next test] 34252: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

2015-02-08 Thread xen . org
flight 34252 linux-next real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34252/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 5 xen-boot running [st=running!] test-amd64-i386-rumpus

[Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 34275: regressions - FAIL

2015-02-08 Thread xen . org
flight 34275 rumpuserxen real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34275/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-rumpuserxen6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 33866 build-amd64-rumpuserx

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 34257: regressions - FAIL

2015-02-08 Thread xen . org
flight 34257 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34257/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 34137 Regressions which ar

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 34259: regressions - FAIL

2015-02-08 Thread xen . org
flight 34259 qemu-mainline real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34259/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 7 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 33480 test-amd64-i38

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen's Linux kernel config options v3

2015-02-08 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > This is a third respin for a design proposal for a rework on the config > options > on the Linux kernel related to Xen. The frist two proposals came from Juergen, > I'm taking on the work now as some other work I am doing is related to this. > This th

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen's Linux kernel config options V2

2015-02-08 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Stefano Stabellini > wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Feb 2015, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Stefano Stabellini > >> wrote: > >> > On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, David Vrabel wrote: > >> >> On 16/12/14 16:21,

[Xen-devel] Inplace upgrading 4.4.x -> 4.5.0

2015-02-08 Thread Steven Haigh
Hi all, I was under the impression that you should be able to do in-place upgrades from Xen 4.4 to 4.5 on a system without losing the ability to manage DomUs... This would support upgrades from running systems from Xen 4.4.x to 4.5.0 - only requiring a reboot to boot into the 4.5.0 hypervisor. W