Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for 4.7 4/4] xen: adopt .deinit_pdata and improve timer handling

On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Meng Xu wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Dario Faggioli > wrote: >> >> The scheduling hooks API is now used properly, and no >> initialization or de-initialization happen in >> alloc/free_pdata any longer.

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 93809: regressions - FAIL

flight 93809 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/93809/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 93800: regressions - FAIL

flight 93800 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/93800/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 93791: regressions - FAIL

flight 93791 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/93791/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for 4.7 0/4] Assorted scheduling fixes

Hi Wei, On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 11:46:27PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This small series contains some bugfixes for various schedulers. They're all > > bugfixes, so I think all should be considered for 4.7.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for 4.7 4/4] xen: adopt .deinit_pdata and improve timer handling

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > The scheduling hooks API is now used properly, and no > initialization or de-initialization happen in > alloc/free_pdata any longer. > > In fact, just like it is for Credit2, there is no real > need for

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 93781: regressions - FAIL

flight 93781 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/93781/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next 2/4] xen-netback: add control protocol implementation

From: Paul Durrant Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 12:19:28 +0100 > +struct xenvif_hash_cache { > + rwlock_t lock; You really don't want to lock on every SKB hash computation like this, turn this into a spin lock for locking the write side and use RCU locking for lookup and

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 93772: regressions - FAIL

flight 93772 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/93772/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 93765: regressions - FAIL

flight 93765 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/93765/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 93756: regressions - FAIL

flight 93756 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/93756/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543

Re: [Xen-devel] xc_altp2m_set_vcpu_enable_notify fail

On May 7, 2016 03:34, "Big Strong" wrote: >> >> libxc functions always return -1 when it fails. You need the specific >> errno to know what went wrong. > > > Yeah, I know it means a failure. Actually, I noticed that there is a comment at the source code of xen, which says : >

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 93747: regressions - FAIL

flight 93747 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/93747/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable baseline-only test] 44394: regressions - FAIL

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 44394 xen-unstable real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/44394/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 14

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 93745: regressions - FAIL

flight 93745 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/93745/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 93734: regressions - FAIL

flight 93734 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/93734/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 93725: tolerable FAIL

flight 93725 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/93725/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 7 host-ping-check-xen fail pass in 93638

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 93731: regressions - FAIL

flight 93731 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/93731/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-libvirt 14 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 91479

[Xen-devel] [distros-debian-stretch test] 44395: trouble: blocked/broken

flight 44395 distros-debian-stretch real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/44395/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i3863 host-install(3) broken

Re: [Xen-devel] xc_altp2m_set_vcpu_enable_notify fail

> > libxc functions always return -1 when it fails. You need the specific > errno to know what went wrong. Yeah, I know it means a failure. Actually, I noticed that there is a comment at the source code of xen