[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable baseline-only test] 71451: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 71451 xen-unstable real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71451/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 15

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] ARM PCI Passthrough design document

Hi Julien, On 5/26/2017 10:44 PM, Julien Grall wrote: Hi all, The document below is an RFC version of a design proposal for PCI Passthrough in Xen on ARM. It aims to describe from an high level perspective the interaction with the different subsystems and how guest will be able to discover and

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 109817: regressions - FAIL

flight 109817 linux-4.9 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/109817/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 107358

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 109813: FAIL

flight 109813 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/109813/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf3 host-install(3) broken in 109803 REGR. vs.

[Xen-devel] boot message "xen:manage: Unable to read sysrq code in control/sysrq" ?

Working with Xen 4.9.0 host on kernel 4.11.3 dmesg | egrep -i "linux version|xen version" [0.00] Linux version 4.11.3-2.g7262353-default (geeko@buildhost) (gcc version 7.1.1 20170517 [gcc-7-branch revision 248152] (SUSE Linux) ) #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu May 25 17:55:04

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 109809: regressions - FAIL

flight 109809 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/109809/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair 11 host-ping-check-xen/src_host fail REGR. vs. 109656

Re: [Xen-devel] xl create failure on arm64 with XEN 4.9rc6

Hi, On 05/26/2017 11:22 PM, Feng Kan wrote: > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Julien Grall wrote: >> >> >> On 26/05/17 01:37, Feng Kan wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Julien Grall >>> wrote: (CC toolstack maintainers)

[Xen-devel] [ovmf baseline-only test] 71453: tolerable FAIL

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 71453 ovmf real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71453/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): build-amd64-libvirt 5 libvirt-build

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 109816: all pass - PUSHED

flight 109816 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/109816/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf f4d3ba87bb8f5d82d3b80532ea4c83b7bbca41c0 baseline version: ovmf

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 109806: regressions - FAIL

flight 109806 linux-4.9 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/109806/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 107358

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-coverity test] 109814: all pass - PUSHED

flight 109814 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/109814/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: xen 876800d5f9de8b15355172794cb82f505dd26e18 baseline version: xen

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 109803: trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 109803 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/109803/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf 3 host-install(3)broken REGR. vs.