Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.5: can't create DomU guest on mustang(arm64)

2015-02-26 Thread Ming Lei
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, I just follow the guide in the link[1], and looks I can boot Dom0 successfully on mustang, and the xen 4.5 tools can be built OK on Dom0 side too. But when I try to create domU with the following commands

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.5: can't create DomU guest on mustang(arm64)

2015-02-26 Thread Ming Lei
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, I just follow the guide in the link[1], and looks I can boot Dom0 successfully on mustang, and the xen 4.5 tools can be built OK on Dom0

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/6] xen-blkfront: avoid to use start/stop queue

2017-07-11 Thread Ming Lei
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 06:41:29PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 02:20 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > This interfaces will be removed soon, so use quiesce and > > unquiesce instead, which should be more safe. > > > > The only one usage will

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/6] xen-blkfront: avoid to use start/stop queue

2017-07-11 Thread Ming Lei
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:24:44PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 02:20:58AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > This interfaces will be removed soon, so use quiesce and > > unquiesce instead, which should be more safe. > > > > The only one usage will

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/6] xen-blkfront: avoid to use start/stop queue

2017-07-11 Thread Ming Lei
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 02:41:05PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 02:20:58AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > This interfaces will be removed soon, so use quiesce and > > unquiesce instead, which should be more safe. > > 'should be'? That does

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/6] xen-blkfront: avoid to use start/stop queue

2017-07-11 Thread Ming Lei
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 06:41:29PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 02:20 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > This interfaces will be removed soon, so use quiesce and > > unquiesce instead, which should be more safe. > > > > The only one usage will

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/6] xen-blkfront: avoid to use start/stop queue

2017-07-11 Thread Ming Lei
trix.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> Cc: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming@redhat.com> --- drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 22 -- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 dele

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/6] xen-blkfront: quiesce/unquiesce queue instead of start/stop queues

2017-07-17 Thread Ming Lei
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:20:56PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 07:15:56AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > stopping queue may cause race and may not stop the queue really > > after the API returns, and we have improved quiescing > > interface an

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/6] xen-blkfront: quiesce/unquiesce queue instead of start/stop queues

2017-07-14 Thread Ming Lei
strovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> Cc: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming@redhat.com> --- drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 22 -- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/6] xen-blkfront: quiesce/unquiesce queue instead of start/stop queues

2017-07-18 Thread Ming Lei
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 08:40:18AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 08:53:28AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:02:27PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:06:28PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/6] xen-blkfront: quiesce/unquiesce queue instead of start/stop queues

2017-07-17 Thread Ming Lei
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:02:27PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:06:28PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:20:56PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 07:15:56AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > > >