On 12/01/2015 14:35, Li, Liang Z wrote:
>
> diff --git a/hw/xen/xen_pt.c b/hw/xen/xen_pt.c index c1bf357..f2893b2 100644
> --- a/hw/xen/xen_pt.c
> +++ b/hw/xen/xen_pt.c
> @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ static int xen_pt_initfn(PCIDevice *d)
> }
>
> out:
> -memory_listener_register(&s->memory_li
On 31/12/2014 00:03, Quan Xu wrote:
> make sure QEMU machine class is initialized and QEMU has registered
> Xen stubdom vTPM driver when call tpm_init()
>
> Signed-off-by: Quan Xu
> ---
> vl.c | 16 ++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/vl.c b/vl
On 12/10/2015 13:09, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Oct 2015, Lan Tianyu wrote:
>> From: >
>>
>> msix->mmio is added to XenPCIPassthroughState's object as property.
>> object_finalize_child_property is called for XenPCIPassthroughState's
>> object, which calls object_property_del_all, whi
On 28/07/2015 03:08, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> This fixes virtio on Xen guests as well as on any other platform
>> that uses virtio_pci on which physical addresses don't match bus
>> addresses.
>>
>> This can be tested with:
>>
>> vir
On 28/07/2015 12:12, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> > That is an experimental feature (it's x-iommu), so it can change.
>> >
>> > The plan was:
>> >
>> > - for PPC, virtio never honors IOMMU
>> >
>> > - for non-PPC, either have virtio always honor IOMMU, or enforce that
>> > virtio is not un
On 28/07/2015 15:11, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> This doesn't matter much, since the only guests that implement an IOMMU
>>> >> in QEMU are (afaik) PPC and x86, and x86 does not yet promise any kind
>>> >> of stability.
>> >
>> > Hmm I think Jan (cc) said it was already used out there.
> Yes
On 28/07/2015 18:42, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > On the other hand interrupt remapping is absolutely necessary for
> > production use, hence my point that x86 does not promise API stability.
>
> Well, we currently implement the features that the Q35 used to expose.
> Adding interrupt remapping will re
On 28/07/2015 19:19, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2015-07-28 19:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28/07/2015 18:42, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> On the other hand interrupt remapping is absolutely necessary for
>>>> production use, hence my point that x86 doe
On 29/07/2015 02:47, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > If new kernels ignore the IOMMU for devices that don't set the flag
> > > and there are physical devices that already exist and don't set the
> > > flag, then those devices won't work reliably on most modern
> > > non-virtual platforms, PPC includ
On 31/12/2014 00:02, Quan Xu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Quan Xu
> ---
> configure| 14 ++
> hmp.c| 7 +++
> qapi-schema.json | 19 ---
> qemu-options.hx | 13 +++--
> tpm.c| 7 ++-
> 5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 6
On 13/04/2015 16:12, Liang Li wrote:
> 2. Do the attach and detach operation with a time interval. eg. 10s.
>
> The error message will not disappear if retry, in this case, it's
> a bug.
>
> In the 'xen_pt_region_add' and 'xen_pt_region_del', we should only care
> about the 'xen-pc
On 15/04/2015 16:14, Li, Liang Z wrote:
> Yes, it's the right place. Put aside the bug fix, I think the
> memory_region_ref/unref pair
> should be move to xen_pt_region_update after the conditional as you point
> out.
> Do you think so?
It would make sense, but I was just guessing... I'm s
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
