On 8/23/2017 5:20 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
..snip..
Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné
Forgot to add, this needs to be backported to stable branches, so:
Annie, could you resend the patch with the tags and an update
to the description to me please?
Done
Thanks
Annie
previous to(including) first busy one get
stopped, blkthread of remaining queue will still run. So stop all threads
properly and return -EBUSY if any queue has inflight I/O.
Signed-off-by: Annie Li <annie...@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Herbert van den Bergh <herbert.van.den.be...@or
On 8/18/2017 5:14 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 06:43:46PM -0400, Annie Li wrote:
If there is inflight I/O in any non-last queue, blkback returns -EBUSY
directly, and never stops thread of remaining queue and processs them. When
removing vbd device with lots of disk I/O
properly and return -EBUSY
if any queue has inflight I/O.
Signed-off-by: Annie Li <annie...@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Herbert van den Bergh <herbert.van.den.be...@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Bhavesh Davda <bhavesh.da...@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Adnan Misherfi <adnan.mishe...@oracle.co
On 11/7/2016 10:38 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 04:42:37PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
.. for PVH guests. However, since emulating them for HVM guests
also doesn't seem useful we can have FADT disable those buttons
for both types of guests.
Wait, we need S3
On 6/2/2016 11:21 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:18:36AM -0400, annie li wrote:
On 4/14/2016 11:36 AM, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, Wei Liu wrote:
Maybe go back to 96ae556569b8eaedc0bb242932842c3277b515d8 and try again?
Then 5cf46a66883ad7a56c5bdee97696373473f80974
On 4/14/2016 11:36 AM, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, Wei Liu wrote:
Maybe go back to 96ae556569b8eaedc0bb242932842c3277b515d8 and try again?
Then 5cf46a66883ad7a56c5bdee97696373473f80974 and try? So that I can
know if it is related to COLO series. No, don't try to bisect that
because
On 2016/1/21 9:17, David Vrabel wrote:
On 21/01/16 12:19, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 10:56 +, David Vrabel wrote:
On 20/01/16 12:23, Ian Campbell wrote:
There have been a few reports recently[0] which relate to a failure of
netfront to allocate sufficient grant refs for
On 2016/1/20 7:23, Ian Campbell wrote:
There have been a few reports recently[0] which relate to a failure of
netfront to allocate sufficient grant refs for all the queues:
[0.533589] xen_netfront: can't alloc rx grant refs
[0.533612] net eth0: only created 31 queues
Which can be