>>> On 22.06.17 at 07:16, wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 08:34:20AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 24.05.17 at 08:56, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ static int
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 08:34:20AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 24.05.17 at 08:56, wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ static int vmx_vmfunc_intercept(struct cpu_user_regs
>> *regs);
>> struct
>>> On 24.05.17 at 08:56, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ static int vmx_vmfunc_intercept(struct cpu_user_regs *regs);
> struct vmx_pi_blocking_vcpu {
> struct list_head list;
> spinlock_t