On 16.04.15 at 18:44, kevin.t...@intel.com wrote:
From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 5:09 PM
On 14/04/15 08:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
Unless Kevin or
Yang object, I'd therefore suggest reverting the change. Once
we determined why VT-d needs
On 10.04.15 at 11:08, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 10/04/15 02:23, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 3:45 AM
Intead of clobbering DMAR - XMAR and back, clobber to RMAD instead.
This
means that changing the
On 14/04/15 08:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.04.15 at 11:08, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 10/04/15 02:23, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 3:45 AM
Intead of clobbering DMAR - XMAR and back, clobber to RMAD instead.
On 09/04/15 09:51, David Vrabel wrote:
On 08/04/15 20:44, Andrew Cooper wrote:
Intead of clobbering DMAR - XMAR and back, clobber to RMAD instead. This
means that changing the signature does not alter the checksum, which allows
the clobbering/unclobbering to be peformed atomically and
On 08/04/15 20:44, Andrew Cooper wrote:
Intead of clobbering DMAR - XMAR and back, clobber to RMAD instead. This
means that changing the signature does not alter the checksum, which allows
the clobbering/unclobbering to be peformed atomically and idempotently, which
is an advantage on the
Intead of clobbering DMAR - XMAR and back, clobber to RMAD instead. This
means that changing the signature does not alter the checksum, which allows
the clobbering/unclobbering to be peformed atomically and idempotently, which
is an advantage on the kexec path which can reenter
