On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 10:50 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > While it appears to be intentional for "xl pci-assignable-remove" to
> > not re-bind the original driver by default (requires the -r option),
> > permanently losing
On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 10:31 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 10:50 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > While it appears to be intentional for "xl pci-assignable-remove" to
> > > not re-bind the original
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> While it appears to be intentional for "xl pci-assignable-remove" to
> not re-bind the original driver by default (requires the -r option),
> permanently losing the information which driver was originally used
> seems bad.
While it appears to be intentional for "xl pci-assignable-remove" to
not re-bind the original driver by default (requires the -r option),
permanently losing the information which driver was originally used
seems bad. Make "add; remove; add; remove -r" re-bind the original
driver by allowing