Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: slightly refine pci-assignable-{add, remove} handling

2015-09-15 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 10:50 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: > > While it appears to be intentional for "xl pci-assignable-remove" to > > not re-bind the original driver by default (requires the -r option), > > permanently losing

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: slightly refine pci-assignable-{add, remove} handling

2015-09-15 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 10:31 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 10:50 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > While it appears to be intentional for "xl pci-assignable-remove" to > > > not re-bind the original

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: slightly refine pci-assignable-{add, remove} handling

2015-09-14 Thread George Dunlap
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: > While it appears to be intentional for "xl pci-assignable-remove" to > not re-bind the original driver by default (requires the -r option), > permanently losing the information which driver was originally used > seems bad.

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: slightly refine pci-assignable-{add, remove} handling

2015-09-10 Thread Jan Beulich
While it appears to be intentional for "xl pci-assignable-remove" to not re-bind the original driver by default (requires the -r option), permanently losing the information which driver was originally used seems bad. Make "add; remove; add; remove -r" re-bind the original driver by allowing