On 07/04/2015 02:01 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
The commit efb6de9b4ba0092b2c55f6a52d16294a8a698edd netfilter: bridge:
forward IPv6 fragmented packets introduced a new function
br_validate_ipv6 which take a reference on the inet6 device. Although,
the reference is not released at the end.
This
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:35 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
__in6_dev_get requires to hold rcu_read_lock or RTNL. My knowledge on
this code is very limited. Are we sure that one this lock is hold? At
first glance, I wasn't able to find one.
You could play it safe ;)
diff --git
Hi,
On 03/07/15 21:42, Florian Westphal wrote:
Julien Grall julien.gr...@citrix.com wrote:
The commit efb6de9b4ba0092b2c55f6a52d16294a8a698edd netfilter: bridge:
forward IPv6 fragmented packets introduced a new function
br_validate_ipv6 which take a reference on the inet6 device. Although,
Julien Grall julien.gr...@citrix.com wrote:
On 03/07/15 21:42, Florian Westphal wrote:
I think it makes more sense to use __in6_dev_get() instead which doesn't
take a reference.
__in6_dev_get requires to hold rcu_read_lock or RTNL. My knowledge on
this code is very limited. Are we sure
Julien Grall julien.gr...@citrix.com wrote:
The commit efb6de9b4ba0092b2c55f6a52d16294a8a698edd netfilter: bridge:
forward IPv6 fragmented packets introduced a new function
br_validate_ipv6 which take a reference on the inet6 device. Although,
the reference is not released at the end.
This
The commit efb6de9b4ba0092b2c55f6a52d16294a8a698edd netfilter: bridge:
forward IPv6 fragmented packets introduced a new function
br_validate_ipv6 which take a reference on the inet6 device. Although,
the reference is not released at the end.
This will result to the impossibility to destroy any
