Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] libxl: use LOG() macro where appropriate

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 0/4] libxl: use LOG() macro where appropriate"): > In terms of applying it seems like the sort of thing which would cause a > lot of pain for backports to 4.6. Shall we hold off or do we think the > inflow of backports has slowed sufficiently now? I would like to

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] libxl: use LOG() macro where appropriate

There are mixed usage of different logging macros. Ideally we only use one style to avoid confusion. Wei Liu (4): libxl: convert to use LOG() macro libxl: fix overly lines and delete extraneous quotes libxl: map LIBXL__LOG_VERBOSE to XTL_VERBOSE libxl: fix places missed by spatch

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] libxl: use LOG() macro where appropriate

On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 15:50 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Wei Liu writes ("[PATCH 0/4] libxl: use LOG() macro where appropriate"): > > There are mixed usage of different logging macros. Ideally we only use > > one > > style to avoid confusion. > > All four > > Acked-by: Ian Jackson

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] libxl: use LOG() macro where appropriate

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 04:16:58PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 15:50 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Wei Liu writes ("[PATCH 0/4] libxl: use LOG() macro where appropriate"): > > > There are mixed usage of different logging macros. Ideally we only use > > > one > > > style to

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] libxl: use LOG() macro where appropriate

Wei Liu writes ("[PATCH 0/4] libxl: use LOG() macro where appropriate"): > There are mixed usage of different logging macros. Ideally we only use one > style to avoid confusion. All four Acked-by: Ian Jackson ___ Xen-devel