On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 08:25:21PM +, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > The fact what include/linux/license.h:license_is_gpl_compatible includes
> > "Dual MIT/GPL" as an option seems to suggest that it is enough of a thing
> > to be validly used as the contents of a MODULE_LICENSE() thing.
>
>
From: One Thousand Gnomes
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:25:21 +
>> The fact what include/linux/license.h:license_is_gpl_compatible includes
>> "Dual MIT/GPL" as an option seems to suggest that it is enough of a thing
>> to be validly used as the contents of a
> The fact what include/linux/license.h:license_is_gpl_compatible includes
> "Dual MIT/GPL" as an option seems to suggest that it is enough of a thing
> to be validly used as the contents of a MODULE_LICENSE() thing.
Yes. The MIT licence most definitely exists, and people know what it
means.
The comment at the beginning of the file is the canonical source of
licenses for this module. Currently it contains GPL and MIT license. Fix
the code to reflect the reality.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),
On 22/01/16 12:34, Wei Liu wrote:
> The comment at the beginning of the file is the canonical source of
> licenses for this module. Currently it contains GPL and MIT license. Fix
> the code to reflect the reality.
"The MIT license" isn't really a thing. The closest is the X11
license[1], but
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 01:14:24PM +, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 22/01/16 12:34, Wei Liu wrote:
> > The comment at the beginning of the file is the canonical source of
> > licenses for this module. Currently it contains GPL and MIT license. Fix
> > the code to reflect the reality.
>
> "The MIT
On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 13:49 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 01:14:24PM +, David Vrabel wrote:
> > On 22/01/16 12:34, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > The comment at the beginning of the file is the canonical source of
> > > licenses for this module. Currently it contains GPL and MIT
On 22/01/16 14:15, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 13:49 +, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 01:14:24PM +, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> On 22/01/16 12:34, Wei Liu wrote:
The comment at the beginning of the file is the canonical source of
licenses for this module.