Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10] tools/libxc: Fix restoration of PV MSRs after migrate

Hi, On 11/16/2017 09:13 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: There are two bugs in process_vcpu_msrs() which clearly demonstrate that I didn't test this bit of Migration v2 very well when writing it... vcpu->msrsz is always expected to be a multiple of xen_domctl_vcpu_msr_t records in a spec-compliant

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10] tools/libxc: Fix restoration of PV MSRs after migrate

>>> On 16.11.17 at 22:13, wrote: > There are two bugs in process_vcpu_msrs() which clearly demonstrate that I > didn't test this bit of Migration v2 very well when writing it... > > vcpu->msrsz is always expected to be a multiple of xen_domctl_vcpu_msr_t > records in a

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10] tools/libxc: Fix restoration of PV MSRs after migrate

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 09:13:22PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > There are two bugs in process_vcpu_msrs() which clearly demonstrate that I > didn't test this bit of Migration v2 very well when writing it... > > vcpu->msrsz is always expected to be a multiple of xen_domctl_vcpu_msr_t > records in

[Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10] tools/libxc: Fix restoration of PV MSRs after migrate

There are two bugs in process_vcpu_msrs() which clearly demonstrate that I didn't test this bit of Migration v2 very well when writing it... vcpu->msrsz is always expected to be a multiple of xen_domctl_vcpu_msr_t records in a spec-compliant stream, so the modulo yields 0 for the msr_count,