Julien Grall writes (Re: [PATCH for Xen 4.5] xen/arm: Add support for GICv3
for domU):
I need to create an empty structure. Is the dummy field really needed?
Empty structs are a gcc extension (`(gcc-4.4) Empty Structures'). I
would be very surprised if clang didn't support them too.
AIUI our
On 11/18/2014 03:10 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Julien Grall writes (Re: [PATCH for Xen 4.5] xen/arm: Add support for GICv3
for domU):
I need to create an empty structure. Is the dummy field really needed?
Empty structs are a gcc extension (`(gcc-4.4) Empty Structures'). I
would be very
Julien Grall writes (Re: [PATCH for Xen 4.5] xen/arm: Add support for GICv3
for domU):
On 11/18/2014 03:10 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Empty structs are a gcc extension (`(gcc-4.4) Empty Structures'). I
would be very surprised if clang didn't support them too.
AFAIK, clang doesn't complain
On 18.11.14 at 16:00, julien.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
On 10/31/2014 09:02 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.10.14 at 19:51, julien.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
The naming suggests that the #if really should be around just the
gic_version field (with a dummy field in the #else case to be C89
compatible,
On 11/18/2014 04:15 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.11.14 at 16:00, julien.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
On 10/31/2014 09:02 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.10.14 at 19:51, julien.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
The naming suggests that the #if really should be around just the
gic_version field (with a dummy
