Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/entry/32: Get rid of paravirt_enabled in ESPFIX

2016-03-03 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 04:47:38PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> Because I'm mixing paravirt and cpufeatures a bit oddly. > > That's fine. All X86_BUG_* are synthetic and exactly for stuff like > that. > > -- >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/entry/32: Get rid of paravirt_enabled in ESPFIX

2016-03-03 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 04:47:38PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Because I'm mixing paravirt and cpufeatures a bit oddly. That's fine. All X86_BUG_* are synthetic and exactly for stuff like that. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/entry/32: Get rid of paravirt_enabled in ESPFIX

2016-03-02 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Mar 1, 2016 2:46 PM, "Borislav Petkov" wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 03:50:18PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Borislav, if you're okay with this (ab)use of the cpufeatures stuff > > Because of X86_BUG_ESPFIX? Why abuse? Because I'm mixing paravirt and cpufeatures a

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/entry/32: Get rid of paravirt_enabled in ESPFIX

2016-03-01 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 03:50:18PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Borislav, if you're okay with this (ab)use of the cpufeatures stuff Because of X86_BUG_ESPFIX? Why abuse? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/entry/32: Get rid of paravirt_enabled in ESPFIX

2016-02-29 Thread Andy Lutomirski
[v2 because I screwed up sending it really badly and it's not worth trying to disentangle the mess] Hi Luis- As promised, here are these patches. Borislav, if you're okay with this (ab)use of the cpufeatures stuff and if they survive review, I'd be okay with them joining Luis' series or going