Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] libxl: do not start dom0 qemu for stubdomain when not needed

2017-07-31 Thread Ian Jackson
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] libxl: do not start dom0 qemu for stubdomain when not needed"): > Hmm... I don't think there is requirement in CODING_STYLE for > multiple-line comment, so there are quite a few styles in use. But > looking at libxl code the prevailing style seems to be: > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] libxl: do not start dom0 qemu for stubdomain when not needed

2017-07-31 Thread Wei Liu
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:42:14PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > Do not setup vfb+vkb when no access method was configured. Then check if > qemu is really needed. > > The only not configurable thing forcing qemu running in dom0 after this > change are consoles used to save/restore.

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] libxl: do not start dom0 qemu for stubdomain when not needed

2017-07-28 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Do not setup vfb+vkb when no access method was configured. Then check if qemu is really needed. The only not configurable thing forcing qemu running in dom0 after this change are consoles used to save/restore. But even in that case, there is much smaller part of qemu exposed. Signed-off-by: