On 09/06/2017 05:51 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 17:30 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 08/18/2017 07:04 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>>>
>>> What we're trying to avoid is one of those idle CPUs to
>>> wake up, only to discover that the grace period is still
>>> running, and
On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 17:30 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/18/2017 07:04 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> >
> > What we're trying to avoid is one of those idle CPUs to
> > wake up, only to discover that the grace period is still
> > running, and that it hence could have be slept longer
> >
On 08/18/2017 07:04 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Idea is: the more CPUs are still active in a grace period,
> the more we can wait to check whether it's time to invoke
> the callbacks (on those CPUs that have already quiesced,
> are idle, and have callbacks queued).
>
> What we're trying to avoid
Idea is: the more CPUs are still active in a grace period,
the more we can wait to check whether it's time to invoke
the callbacks (on those CPUs that have already quiesced,
are idle, and have callbacks queued).
What we're trying to avoid is one of those idle CPUs to
wake up, only to discover
