At 13:53 + on 13 Jan (1421153637), Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 14:45 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
+gmfn = mfn_to_gmfn(d, mfn);
(I haven't thought about it super hard, but I'm taking it as given that
this approach to kexec is going to be needed for ARM too,
On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 14:45 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
+gmfn = mfn_to_gmfn(d, mfn);
(I haven't thought about it super hard, but I'm taking it as given that
this approach to kexec is going to be needed for ARM too, since that
seems likely)
mfn_to_gmfn is going to be a bit pricey
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 13:57 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.12.14 at 14:45, vkuzn...@redhat.com wrote:
--- a/xen/common/domctl.c
+++ b/xen/common/domctl.c
@@ -1177,6 +1177,39 @@ long do_domctl(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_domctl_t)
u_domctl)
}
break;
+case
Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com writes:
On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 14:45 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
+gmfn = mfn_to_gmfn(d, mfn);
(I haven't thought about it super hard, but I'm taking it as given that
this approach to kexec is going to be needed for ARM too, since that
seems
On 13.01.15 at 17:17, vkuzn...@redhat.com wrote:
Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com writes:
An alternative approach to this might be to walk the guest p2m (with
appropriate continuations) and move each domheap page (this would also
help us preserve super page mappings). It would also have
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 17:17 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com writes:
On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 14:45 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
+gmfn = mfn_to_gmfn(d, mfn);
(I haven't thought about it super hard, but I'm taking it as given that
this
Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com writes:
On 13.01.15 at 17:17, vkuzn...@redhat.com wrote:
Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com writes:
An alternative approach to this might be to walk the guest p2m (with
appropriate continuations) and move each domheap page (this would also
help us preserve
On 13.01.15 at 17:45, vkuzn...@redhat.com wrote:
Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com writes:
On 13.01.15 at 17:17, vkuzn...@redhat.com wrote:
Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com writes:
An alternative approach to this might be to walk the guest p2m (with
appropriate continuations) and move each
On 11.12.14 at 14:45, vkuzn...@redhat.com wrote:
--- a/xen/common/domctl.c
+++ b/xen/common/domctl.c
@@ -1177,6 +1177,39 @@ long do_domctl(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_domctl_t)
u_domctl)
}
break;
+case XEN_DOMCTL_devour:
+{
+struct domain *recipient_dom;
+
New operation sets the 'recipient' domain which will receive all
memory pages from a particular domain and kills the original domain.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov vkuzn...@redhat.com
---
xen/common/domain.c | 3 +++
xen/common/domctl.c | 33 +
10 matches
Mail list logo
