Hi Jan,
On 21/08/17 14:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.08.17 at 12:30, wrote:
On 16/08/17 19:33, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
.. so that it's easy to find pages that need to be scrubbed (those pages are
now marked with _PGC_need_scrub bit).
We keep track of the first unscrubbed
>>> On 17.08.17 at 12:30, wrote:
> On 16/08/17 19:33, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> .. so that it's easy to find pages that need to be scrubbed (those pages are
>> now marked with _PGC_need_scrub bit).
>>
>> We keep track of the first unscrubbed page in a page buddy using
On 08/18/2017 05:11 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 16.08.17 at 20:33, wrote:
>> .. so that it's easy to find pages that need to be scrubbed (those pages are
>> now marked with _PGC_need_scrub bit).
>>
>> We keep track of the first unscrubbed page in a page buddy using
>>> On 16.08.17 at 20:33, wrote:
> .. so that it's easy to find pages that need to be scrubbed (those pages are
> now marked with _PGC_need_scrub bit).
>
> We keep track of the first unscrubbed page in a page buddy using first_dirty
> field. For now it can have two
Hi Boris,
On 16/08/17 19:33, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
.. so that it's easy to find pages that need to be scrubbed (those pages are
now marked with _PGC_need_scrub bit).
We keep track of the first unscrubbed page in a page buddy using first_dirty
field. For now it can have two values, 0 (whole
.. so that it's easy to find pages that need to be scrubbed (those pages are
now marked with _PGC_need_scrub bit).
We keep track of the first unscrubbed page in a page buddy using first_dirty
field. For now it can have two values, 0 (whole buddy needs scrubbing) or
INVALID_DIRTY_IDX (the buddy