Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [edk2] EDK II & GPL - Re: OVMF BoF @ KVM Forum 2015

2015-09-11 Thread Kevin Davis
> > On 09/10/2015 08:14 PM, Kevin Davis wrote: > >> > > Ah. I wasn't in the room when they figured it out. And I've never seen > their written opinion. Is it documented somewhere? > > which in turn leads to this FAQ: > https://web.archive.org/web/20121116185559/http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/ >

Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [edk2] EDK II & GPL - Re: OVMF BoF @ KVM Forum 2015

2015-09-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 05:41:59PM -0700, Jordan Justen wrote: > On 2015-09-09 16:05:20, Andrew Fish wrote: > > > > > On Sep 9, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Jordan Justen > > > wrot> > > FWIW, I don't mind if the consensus is that GplDriverPkg must > > > live in > > > a

Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [edk2] EDK II & GPL - Re: OVMF BoF @ KVM Forum 2015

2015-09-10 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 05:41:59PM -0700, Jordan Justen wrote: > > On 2015-09-09 16:05:20, Andrew Fish wrote: > > > > > > > On Sep 9, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Jordan Justen > > > > wrot> > > FWIW, I don't mind if the

Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [edk2] EDK II & GPL - Re: OVMF BoF @ KVM Forum 2015

2015-09-10 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/10/2015 08:14 PM, Kevin Davis wrote: >> >> >> On 10/09/2015 16:24, Kevin Davis wrote: >>> Further leading me to guess that any actual use of those >>> implementations could lead to you actually needing to hire a real >>> attorney and not one that you find on YouTube. >> >> The good thing is

Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [edk2] EDK II & GPL - Re: OVMF BoF @ KVM Forum 2015

2015-09-10 Thread Andrew Fish
> On Sep 10, 2015, at 8:44 PM, Kevin Davis wrote: > >> >> On 09/10/2015 08:14 PM, Kevin Davis wrote: >>> Ah. I wasn't in the room when they figured it out. And I've never seen >> their written opinion. Is it documented somewhere? >> >> which in turn leads to