On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 03:27:08PM +0200, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
>
> On 12/08/2016 22:50, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 05:00:47PM +0200, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/current.h
> > > > b/xen/include/asm-arm/current.h
> > > >
Hi Konrad,
On 12/08/2016 22:50, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 05:00:47PM +0200, Julien Grall wrote:
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/current.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/current.h
index 65c0cdf..f4fcfd6 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/current.h
+++
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 05:00:47PM +0200, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
>
> On 09/08/2016 06:19, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > The initial support for ARM64 - and livepatching
> > works:
>
> As it is a very RFC I only gave a quick look. I have few comments on it (see
> below).
>
> >
> >
Hi Konrad,
On 09/08/2016 06:19, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
The initial support for ARM64 - and livepatching
works:
As it is a very RFC I only gave a quick look. I have few comments on it
(see below).
(XEN) livepatch: xen_hello_world: Applying 1 functions
(XEN) hi_func: Hi! (called 1
The initial support for ARM64 - and livepatching
works:
(XEN) livepatch: xen_hello_world: Applying 1 functions
(XEN) hi_func: Hi! (called 1 times)
(XEN) Hook executing.
(XEN) livepatch: xen_hello_world finished APPLY with rc=0
(XEN) livepatch.c:1687: livepatch: load_payload_fnc: rc=0 (p->rc=0)
