On 30/05/17 16:40, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
>> Does
>> +domctl.u.address_size.size = 0;
>> help?
> Likely yes. I just scanned the buildlogs and found this failure.
> I do not have a ARM toolchain around to double check.
> Not sure why the marco, or its usage,
On Tue, May 30, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Does
> +domctl.u.address_size.size = 0;
> help?
Likely yes. I just scanned the buildlogs and found this failure.
I do not have a ARM toolchain around to double check.
Not sure why the marco, or its usage, is not like 'struct xen_domctl domctl =
{}'
On 30/05/17 16:27, Olaf Hering wrote:
> With gcc7 the aarch64 build in staging fails:
>
> xc_dom_arm.c: In function 'meminit':
> xc_dom_arm.c:229:31: error: 'domctl.u.address_size.size' may be used
> uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> if (
With gcc7 the aarch64 build in staging fails:
xc_dom_arm.c: In function 'meminit':
xc_dom_arm.c:229:31: error: 'domctl.u.address_size.size' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
if ( domctl.u.address_size.size == 0 )
