On 07.02.2020 16:57, David Woodhouse wrote:
> @@ -1145,16 +1145,19 @@ static int reserve_offlined_page(struct page_info
> *head)
>
> for ( cur_head = head; cur_head < head + ( 1UL << head_order);
> cur_head++ )
> {
> -if ( !page_state_is(cur_head, offlined) )
> +
> -Original Message-
> From: Wei Liu On Behalf Of Wei Liu
> Sent: 19 February 2020 11:44
> To: Xen Development List
> Cc: Michael Kelley ; Durrant, Paul
> ; Wei Liu ; Wei Liu
> ; Jan Beulich ; Andrew Cooper
> ; Roger Pau Monné
> Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] x86/hyperv: L0 assisted TLB flush
flight 147279 linux-4.4 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/147279/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel 17 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail REGR. vs.
139698
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 04:46:17PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> While in "host" strategy all regions get processed, of the per-device
> ones only the first entry has been consumed so far.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Acked-by: Wei Liu
___
Xen-devel
On 20/02/2020 01:53, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 09:31:29PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> Fixes some fallout from: c588c002cc1 ('tools: remove tmem code and commands')
>
> Thanks. I made some suggestions on adding commit messages. Let me know
> if you're okay with those.
>
>
On 20.02.2020 10:59, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
> On 19.02.2020 19:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.02.2020 10:18, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>>> @@ -4835,6 +4836,23 @@ static int do_altp2m_op(
>>> break;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +case HVMOP_altp2m_set_visibility:
>>> +{
>>>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:51:23AM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 09:31:31PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Sander Eikelenboom
> > ---
>
> I will add the following commit message:
>
> The variable freealbe_mb was never really used. Delete it and the code
>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:48:16AM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> The code looks correct to me, but I would like to add the following
> commit message to this change.
>
> Used memory should be calculated by subtracting free memory from total
> memory.
Fixes: c588c002cc1 ("tools: remove tmem code and
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 09:31:29PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Fixes some fallout from: c588c002cc1 ('tools: remove tmem code and commands')
Thanks. I made some suggestions on adding commit messages. Let me know
if you're okay with those.
Wei.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 09:31:32PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Sander Eikelenboom
Acked-by: Wei Liu
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 09:31:31PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Sander Eikelenboom
> ---
I will add the following commit message:
The variable freealbe_mb was never really used. Delete it and the code
associated with it.
Acked-by: Wei Liu
> tools/xenstat/xentop/xentop.c
On 19.02.2020 19:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.02.2020 10:18, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>> @@ -4835,6 +4836,23 @@ static int do_altp2m_op(
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> +case HVMOP_altp2m_set_visibility:
>> +{
>> +uint16_t altp2m_idx =
Hi Jan,
On 2020/2/20 16:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.02.2020 08:44, Wei Xu wrote:
>> On 2020/2/17 21:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 03.02.2020 12:21, Wei Xu wrote:
+static int __init ns16550_acpi_uart_init(const void *data)
+{
+struct acpi_table_header *table;
+struct
The code looks correct to me, but I would like to add the following
commit message to this change.
Used memory should be calculated by subtracting free memory from total
memory.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 09:31:30PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Sander Eikelenboom
> ---
>
On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 13:27 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> When dumping the run queue information add some more data regarding
> current and (if known) previous vcpu for each physical cpu.
>
> With core scheduling activated the printed data will be e.g.:
>
> (XEN) CPUs info:
> (XEN) CPU[00]
Hi everyone,
Since I use Xen 4.11 on Debian 10, sometimes (about one in twenty times)
after a dom-u reboot, it stays stuck with the state '---sr-'.
This had never happened for me with Xen 4.4 on Debian 8.
I have to manually destroy and reboot the dom-u stuck domain.
I can't see any error in
On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 07:56 +0100, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 19.02.20 19:37, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 17:52 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >
> > Nevertheless, I'd add a quick comment about that, to make it even
> > more
> > obvious. :-)
>
> Do we really need that?
>
>
On 19.02.2020 18:37, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 2:19 AM Alexandru Stefan ISAILA
> wrote:
>>
>> At this moment a guest can call vmfunc to change the altp2m view. This
>> should be limited in order to avoid any unwanted view switch.
>>
>> The new xc_altp2m_set_visibility()
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 08:57:33AM +, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 20/02/2020 08:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 20.02.2020 09:27, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> > > On 20.02.20 09:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 13.02.2020 12:32, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > > > > Most users of the cpu maps just care
On 20.02.20 09:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.02.2020 09:22, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 19.02.20 17:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.02.2020 09:11, Juergen Gross wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S
@@ -89,6 +89,11 @@ SECTIONS
__start_schedulers_array = .;
> -Original Message-
> From: Xen-devel On Behalf Of
> Roger Pau Monné
> Sent: 20 February 2020 08:39
> To: Agarwal, Anchal
> Cc: Valentin, Eduardo ; len.br...@intel.com;
> pet...@infradead.org; b...@kernel.crashing.org; x...@kernel.org; linux-
> m...@kvack.org; pa...@ucw.cz;
On 20.02.20 09:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.02.2020 08:27, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 19.02.20 16:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.02.2020 09:11, Juergen Gross wrote:
+static inline void hypfs_string_set(struct hypfs_entry_leaf *leaf,
+const char *str)
+{
+
flight 147255 linux-4.9 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/147255/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel 17 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail REGR. vs.
142947
On 20/02/2020 08:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.02.2020 09:27, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 20.02.20 09:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.02.2020 12:32, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
Most users of the cpu maps just care about the maps not changing while
the lock is being held, but don't actually modify the
On 20.02.2020 08:27, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 19.02.20 16:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.02.2020 09:11, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> +static inline void hypfs_string_set(struct hypfs_entry_leaf *leaf,
>>> +const char *str)
>>> +{
>>> +leaf->content = str;
>>> +
On 20.02.2020 09:22, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 19.02.20 17:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.02.2020 09:11, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S
>>> @@ -89,6 +89,11 @@ SECTIONS
>>> __start_schedulers_array = .;
>>> *(.data.schedulers)
Thanks for this work, please see below.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 06:04:24PM +, Anchal Agarwal wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:16:11AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 11:05:53PM +, Anchal Agarwal wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 11:05:09AM +0100, Roger Pau
On 20.02.2020 09:27, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 20.02.20 09:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 13.02.2020 12:32, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> Most users of the cpu maps just care about the maps not changing while
>>> the lock is being held, but don't actually modify the maps.
>>>
>>> Convert the lock into a
On 20.02.2020 08:44, Wei Xu wrote:
> On 2020/2/17 21:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 03.02.2020 12:21, Wei Xu wrote:
>>> +static int __init ns16550_acpi_uart_init(const void *data)
>>> +{
>>> +struct acpi_table_header *table;
>>> +struct acpi_table_spcr *spcr;
>>> +acpi_status status;
>>>
On 19.02.2020 19:52, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> On 19/02/2020 07:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.12.2019 22:39, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>>> @@ -38,24 +37,22 @@ void hvm_init_guest_time(struct domain *d)
>>> uint64_t hvm_get_guest_time_fixed(const struct vcpu *v, uint64_t at_tsc)
>>> {
>>> struct
On 20.02.20 09:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.02.2020 12:32, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
Most users of the cpu maps just care about the maps not changing while
the lock is being held, but don't actually modify the maps.
Convert the lock into a rw lock, and take the lock in read mode in
get_cpu_maps
On 19.02.20 17:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.02.2020 09:11, Juergen Gross wrote:
--- a/docs/misc/hypfs-paths.pandoc
+++ b/docs/misc/hypfs-paths.pandoc
@@ -152,3 +152,12 @@ The major version of Xen.
/buildinfo/version/minor = INTEGER
The minor version of Xen.
+
+ /params/
+
+A
On 19.02.2020 18:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.02.2020 17:08, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 03:07:14PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 19/02/2020 14:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.02.2020 15:45, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 02:44:12PM +0100, Jan
On 13.02.2020 12:32, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Most users of the cpu maps just care about the maps not changing while
> the lock is being held, but don't actually modify the maps.
>
> Convert the lock into a rw lock, and take the lock in read mode in
> get_cpu_maps and in write mode in
101 - 134 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
