On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix
>
> This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
> I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or
> normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting
>
From: Tom Rix
This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or
normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting
early acks.
clang has a number of useful, new warnings see
flight 155926 linux-5.4 real [real]
flight 155944 linux-5.4 real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/155926/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/155944/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 9:10 AM wrote:
>
> From: Tom Rix
>
> This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
> I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or
> normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting
> early acks.
>
> clang
flight 155921 xen-unstable real [real]
flight 155936 xen-unstable real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/155921/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/155936/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be
On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 20:21 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote:
> > > From: Tom Rix
> > >
> > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
> > > I am wondering if the change could be
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Tom Rix
> >
> > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
> > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or
> > normal patch per file about
Hello xen project team,
I am using xen 4.14 from AUR on a laptop with arch linux.
I tried running a windows 10 domU with QXL graphics.
In my xl configuration file I set:
vga="qxl"
Within the domU itself I installed the latest qxldod driver from
fedora project.
Right after installation, the
On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix
>
> This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
> I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or
> normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting
> early
flight 155914 qemu-upstream-4.14-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/155914/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 12 debian-di-install fail in 155892 pass in 155914
flight 155911 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/155911/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd11-amd64 13 guest-startfail REGR. vs. 152631
flight 155920 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/155920/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-i386-libvirt
flight 155910 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/155910/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332
flight 155908 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/155908/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 30f0ec8d80072ae3ab58e08014e6b2ffe3ef97e1
baseline version:
ovmf
14 matches
Mail list logo
